Mechanical comparison of two types of fixation for proximal first metatarsal crescentic osteotomy

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 371-374

  Jones, Carroll ^a,b   Coughlin, Michael ^a,c   Petersen, Wolf ^a,d   Herbot, Mirco ^a,d   Paletta, Jürgen ^a,d  

^a Miller Orthopaedic Clinic ^*

^b ORTHOCAROLINA HIP AND KNEE CENTER   (United States)

^c Idaho Foot and Ankle Fellowship   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

First Metatarsal; Fixation; Proximal Crescentic Osteotomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PLATE; BONE SCREW; BONE STRENGTH; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; HALLUX VALGUS; KIRSCHNER WIRE; METATARSAL BONE; METATARSALGIA; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PARAMETER; PLATE FIXATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL CRESCENTIC OSTEOTOMY; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RIGIDITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 18244375829     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600505     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Campbell, JT; Schon, LC; Parks, BG; Wang, Y; Berger, BI: Mechanical comparison of biplanar proximal closing wedge osteotomy with plantar plate fixation versus crescentic osteotomy with screw fixation for the correction of metatarsus primus varus. Foot Ankle Int. 19:293-299, 1998.
2. Coughlin, MJ: Hallux valgus. J. Bone Joint Surg. 78-A:932-966, 1996.
3. Coughlin, MJ: Proximal first metatarsal osteotomy. In Kitaoka, H (ed.), Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Foot and Ankle, 2nd ed, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 71-98, 2002.
4. Earll, M; Wayne, J; Caldwell, P; Adelaar, R: Comparison of two proximal osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 19:425-429, 1998.
5. Easley, ME; Kiebzak, GM; Davis, WH; Anderson, RB: Prospective, randomized comparison of proximal crescentic and proximal chevron osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 17:307-316, 1996.
6. Jones, CP; Coughlin, MJ; Viladot, R; Galano, P: Proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy: the effect of saw blade orientation on first ray elevation. Foot Ankle Int, accepted for publication.
7. Lian, GJ; Markolf, K; Cracchiolo, A III: Strength of fixation constructs for basilar osteotomies of the first metatarsal. Foot Ankle 13:509-514, 1992.
8. Lippert, FG III; McDermott, JE: Crescentic osteotomy for hallux valgus: a biomechanical study of variables affecting the final position of the first metatarsal. Foot Ankle 11:204-207, 1991.
9. Mann, RA; Rudicel, S; Graves, SC: Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. 74-A:124-129, 1992.
10. McCluskey, LC; Johnson, JE; Wynarsky, GT; Harris, GF: Comparison of stability of proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy and proximal horizontal "V" osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 15:263-270, 1994.
11. Nyska, M; Trnka, HJ; Parks, BG; Myerson, MS: Proximal metatarsal osteotomies: a comparative geometric analysis conducted on sawbone models. Foot Ankle Int. 23:938-945, 2002.
12. Pearson, SW; Kitaoka, HB; Cracchiolo, A; Leventen, EO: Results and complications following a proximal curved osteotomy of the hallux metatarsal. Contemp. Orthop. 23:127-132, 1991.
13. Rosenberg, GA; Donley, BG: Plate augmentation of screw fixation of proximal crescentic osteotomy of the first metatarsal. Foot Ankle Int. 24:570-571, 2003.
14. Sammarco, GJ; Idusuyi, OB: Complications after surgery of the hallux. Clin. Orthop. 391:59-71, 2001.
15. Thompson, FM: Complications of hallux valgus surgery and salvage. Orthopedics 13:1059-1067, 1990.
16. Thordarson, DB; Leventen, EO: Hallux valgus correction with proximal metatarsal osteotomy: two-year follow-up. Foot Ankle 13:321-326, 1992.
17. Trnka, HJ; Parks, BG; Ivanic, G; et al.: Six first metatarsal shaft osteotomies: mechanical and immobilization comparisons. Clin Orthop. 381:256-265, 2000.
18. Veri, JP; Pirani, SP; Claridge, R: Crescentic proximal metatarsal osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus: a mean 12.2 year follow-up study. Foot Ankle Int. 22:817-822, 2001.