Is there a continuing role for prospective observational studies in spine research?

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 847-849

  Keller, Robert B ^a,c   Atlas, Steven J ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TYPES OF STUDY;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPINAL DISEASES;

EID: 18244374756     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158955.62508.a8     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2005;30:926-934.
2. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2005;30:935-942.
3. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987-91.
4. Wennberg J, and Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am 1982;246:120-34.
5. Keller RB, Soule DN, Wennberg JE, et al. Dealing with geographic variations in the use of hospitals. The experience of the Maine Medical Assessment Foundation Orthopaedic Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1286-93.
6. Wennberg JE. Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. Health Affairs 1984;3:6-32.
7. Gray BH. The legislative battle over health services research. Health Affairs 1992;11:38-66.
8. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997;22:2807-12.
9. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26:2521-32.
10. Birkmeyer NJO, Weinstein JN, Tosteson AN, et al. Design of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 2002;27:1361-72.
11. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA 1998;279:1278-81.
12. Weinstein JN. The Dartmouth Atlas of Musculoskeletal Health Care. Chicago: AHA Press; 2000.
13. Keller RB, Atlas SJ, Soule DN, et al. Relationship between rates and outcomes of operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:752-62.
14. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
15. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1878-86.
16. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1887-92.
17. Pocock SJ, Elbourne DR. Randomized trials or observational tribulations. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1907-9.