Individual characteristics affecting participation in urban and community forestry programs in South Carolina, U.S

Journal of Arboriculture

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 131-137

  Straka, Thomas J ^a   Marsinko, Allan P ^a   Childers, Christopher J ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community forestry; Tree programs; Urban and community forestry; Urban forestry

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY FORESTRY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; URBAN FORESTRY;

NORTH AMERICA; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 18244365586     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alig, R.J., F. Bedford, R.J. Moulton, and L. Lee. 1999. Longterm projection of urban and developed land area in the United States. In Keep America Growing-Balancing Working Lands and Development: Conference Proceedings (CD-ROM). American Farmland Trust, Washington, DC, Additional information at www.farmland.org (accessed 3/24/05).
2. Alig, R.J., A.J. Plantinga, S. Ahn, and J.D. Kline. 2003. Land use changes involving forestry in the United States 1952 to 1997, with Projections to 2050. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-587. 92 pp.
3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 35(4):216-224.
4. Cubbage, F.W., J. O'Laughlin, and C. S. Bullock. 1993. Forest Resource Policy. Wiley, New York, NY. 592 pp.
5. Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY. 325 pp.
6. Florida Division of Forestry. 2004. Urban and Community Forestry Grant Program. Tallahassee, FL. www.fl-dof.com/forest_management/ cfa_urban_grants.html (accessed 3/24/05).
7. Heimlich, R.E., and W.D. Anderson. 2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Economic Reporting Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Washington, DC. 88 pp.
8. London, J.B., and N.L Hill. 2000. Land Conversion in South Carolina: State Makes the Top 10 List. Jim Self Center on the Future, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 4 pp.
9. McPherson, E.G. 1994. Benefits and costs of tree planting and care in Chicago, pp. 115-133. In McPherson, E.G., D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree [Eds.]. Chicago's Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186.
10. National Arbor Day Foundation. 2004. Tree City USA. Nebraska City, NE. www.arborday.org/programs/treecityusa.cfm (accessed 3/24/05).
11. Nowak, D.J. 1994. Air pollution removal by Chicago's urban forest, pp. 63-81 In McPherson, E.G., D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree [Eds.]. Chicago's Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186.
12. South Carolina Forestry Commission 2003a. Personal communications with statewide program coordinator and foresters about past participants in U&CF programs.
13. South Carolina Forestry Commission. 2003b. Awards 2003 Urban & Community Forestry Grants. Columbia, SC. www.state.sc.us/forest/ 03ucfgrant.pdf (accessed 3/24/05).
14. South Carolina Forestry Commission. 2004. Urban and Community Forestry Grant Assistance Program. Columbia, SC. www.state.sc.us/forest/ ucfgrantbr.pdf (accessed 3/24/05).
15. USDA Forest Service. 2004. Urban Forestry: A Manual for the State Forestry Agencies in the Southern Region. www.urbanforestrysouth.usda. gov/pubs/ufmanual (accessed 3/24/05).
16. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2000. Population Projections, Medium Level. Washington, DC. www.census.gov/population/www/ projections/popproj.html (accessed 3/24/05).
17. Vesterby, M., and K.S. Krupa. 2001. Major Uses of Land in the United States, 1997. Economic Reporting Service Statistical Bulletin No. 973. Washington, DC, 60 pp.
18. Wisconsin DNR. 2004. Urban & Community Forestry Program Information. Madison, WI. www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/forestry/UF/program (accessed 3/24/05).