|
Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 239-251
|
Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILE;
BILE DUCT TUMOR;
COMMON BILE DUCT;
COMMON BILE DUCT STONE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PATHOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
RADIOGRAPHY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STATISTICS;
STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BILE;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS;
COMMON BILE DUCT;
COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS;
CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC;
FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 18244364389
PISSN: 00338362
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (38)
|
References (0)
|