Systematics of quadrupolar correlation energies

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 10, 2005, Pages

  Bender, M ^a   Bertsch, G F ^a   Heenen, P H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGULAR MOMENTUM; GENERATOR COORDINATED METHOD (GCM); MEAN FIELD APPROXIMATION; NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BINDING ENERGY; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; NEUTRONS; PROBABILITY; PROTONS;

NUCLEAR PHYSICS;

EID: 18144431005     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102503     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A729, 337 (2003); the data file is available at http:// www-csnsm.in2p3.fr/AMDC/masstables/ Ame2003/mass.mas03.
2. K. Langanke and M. Wiescher, Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 1657 (2001).
3. M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003).
4. M. V. Stoitsov, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, S. Pittel, and D. J. Dean, Phys. Rev. C 68, 054312 (2003); http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~dobaczew/thodri/ s9120v56.rev.txt.
5. G. A. Lalazissis, S. Raman, and P. Ring, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 71, 1 (1999).
6. G. F. Bertsch, B. Sabbey, and M. Uusnäkki (to be published).
7. P. Möller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers, and W. J. Swiatecki, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995).
8. F. Tondeur, S. Goriely, J. M. Pearson, and M. Onsi, Phys. Rev. C 62, 024308 (2000).
9. S. Goriely, M. Samyn, M. Bender, and J. M. Pearson, Phys. Rev. C 68, 054325 (2003).
10. I. Stetcu and C. Johnson, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034301 (2002).
11. S. Baroni, M. Armati, F. Barranco, R. A. Broglia, G. Colo', G. Gori, and E. Vigezzi, J. Phys. G 30, 1353 (2004).
12. M. Bender and P.-H. Heenen, Nucl. Phys. A713, 390 (2003); A. Valor, P.-H. Heenen, and P. Bonche, Nucl. Phys. A671, 145 (2000).
13. M. Bender and P.-H. Heenen, Nucl. Phys. A713, 390 (2003); A. Valor, P.-H. Heenen, and P. Bonche, Nucl. Phys. A671, 145 (2000).
14. P. Bonche, H. Flocard, P.-H. Heenen, S. J. Krieger, and M. S. Weiss, Nucl. Phys. A443, 39 (1985).
15. E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A635, 231 (1998); A643, 441 (E) (1998).
16. E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A635, 231 (1998); A643, 441 (E) (1998).
17. M. Bender, P. Bonche, T. Duguet, and P.-H. Heenen, Phys. Rev. C 69, 064303 (2004).
18. C. Rigollet, P. Bonche, H. Flocard, and P.-H. Heenen, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3120 (1999).
19. P. Bonche, J. Dobaczewski, H. Flocard, P.-H. Heenen, and J. Meyer, Nucl. Phys. A510, 466 (1990).
20. M. Bender, G. F. Bertsch, and P.-H. Heenen, Phys. Rev. C 69, 034340 (2004).
21. T. Duguet and P. Bonche, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054308 (2003).
22. We also omit some small terms that appear in the Hamiltonian formulation of the Skyrme interaction but not in the energy density functional.
23. D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953); J. J. Griffin and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 311 (1957).
24. D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953); J. J. Griffin and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 311 (1957).
25. K. Hagino, P.-G. Reinhard, and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C 65, 064320 (2002).
26. Since the SLy4 interaction was fitted to only magic nuclei, the other nuclei show a trend of increasing residuals with mass number. This is easily removed by a minor adjustment of parameters [6].
27. N. Zeldes, T. S. Dumitrescu, and H. S. Kohler, Nucl. Phys. A399, 11 (1983).
28. D. Lunney, J. M. Pearson, and C. Thibault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1021 (2003).
29. M. Bender, T. Cornelius, G. A. Lalazissis, J. A. Maruhn, W. Nazarewicz, and P.-G. Reinhard, Eur. Phys. J. A 14, 23 (2002).
30. P. Fleischer, P. Klüpfel, P.-G. Reinhard, and J. A. Maruhn, Phys. Rev. C 70, 054321 (2004).
31. P.-H. Heenen, A. Valor, M. Bender, P. Bonche, and H. Flocard, Eur. Phys. J. A 11, 393 (2001).