Security bounds for continuous variables quantum key distribution

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Navascués, Miguel ^a   Acín, Antonio ^a  

^a ICFO INSTITUT DE CIENCIES FOTONIQUES   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL TRANSMISSION; HOMODYNE; QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION; QUANTUM STATES;

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); DATA PRIVACY; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; QUANTUM THEORY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 18144424865     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.020505     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982).
2. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (IEEE, New York, 1984).
3. For a recent review, see N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002).
4. M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022309 (2000); N. J. Cerf, M. Lévy, and G. Van Assche, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052311 (2001).
5. M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022309 (2000); N. J. Cerf, M. Lévy, and G. Van Assche, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052311 (2001).
6. D. Gottesman and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022309 (2001).
7. F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057902 (2002).
8. F. Grosshans et al., Nature (London) 421, 238 (2003).
9. S. Iblisdir, G. Van Assche, and N. J. Cerf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 170502 (2004).
10. F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Quantum Communication, Measurement and Computing, edited by J. H. Shapiro and J. O. Hirota (Rinton Press, Princeton, NJ, 2002), p. 351.
11. We consider only reconciliation protocols using one-way communication. The case of two-way communication has been studied in Ch. Silberhorn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167901 (2002); M. Navascués et al., quant-ph/0405047 [Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)].
12. We consider only reconciliation protocols using one-way communication. The case of two-way communication has been studied in Ch. Silberhorn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167901 (2002); M. Navascués et al., quant-ph/0405047 [Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)].
13. We consider only reconciliation protocols using one-way communication. The case of two-way communication has been studied in Ch. Silberhorn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167901 (2002); M. Navascués et al., quant-ph/0405047 [Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)].
14. M. Christandl, R. Renner, and A. Ekert, quant-ph/0402131.
15. R. Renner and R. Koenig, quant-ph/0403133; I. Devetak and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 080501 (2004).
16. R. Renner and R. Koenig, quant-ph/0403133; I. Devetak and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 080501 (2004).
17. F. Grosshans, preceding Letter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 020504 (2005).
18. F. Grosshans et al., Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 535 (2003).
19. F. Grosshans and N. J. Cerf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 047905 (2004).
20. J. I. Cirac, J. Eisert, G. Giedke, M. Lewenstein, M. B. Plenio, R. F. Werner, and M. M. Wolf (to be published).
21. A. S. Holevo, Probl. Inf. Transm. 9, 177 (1973).
22. M. Navascués, F. Grosshans, and A. Acín (to be published).
23. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996).