How prenatal diagnosis became acceptable in France

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 246-249

  Vassy, Carine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; DISEASES; HEALTH CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

DOWN'S SYNDROME; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

ABORTION; DOWN SYNDROME; FRANCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 18144414330     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. M. Elston Introduction M. Elston The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology 1997 Blackwell Publishers 1 27
2. T. Marteau M. Richards The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics 1996 Cambridge University Press
3. A. Petersen, and R. Bunton The new genetics and the public's health 2002 Routledge
4. A. Pilnick Genetics and society 2002 Open University Press
5. A. Kerr, and T. Shakespeare Genetic Politics. From eugenics to genome 2002 New Clarion Press
6. D. Lupton The Imperative of Health. Public Health and the Regulated Body 1995 Sage
7. Kerr, A. (2004) Genetics and societh: A Sociology of Disease, Routledge
8. D. MacKenzie, and J. Wajcman The social shaping of technology 1999 Open University Press
9. A. Clarke, and T. Montini The many faces of RU486: Tales of situated knowledges and technological contestations Science, Technology & Human Values 18 1993 42 78
10. B. Latour, and S. Woolgar Laboratory Life. The construction of scientific fact 1986 Princeton University Press
11. E. Carles, and P. Eydoux Cytogénétique prénatale: bilan 1999 pour l'association des cytogénéticiens de langue française Médecine fœtale et échographie en gynécologie 50 2002 5 8
12. S. Aymé Prenatal Diagnosis in France Eur J Hum Gen 5 Suppl. 1 1997 26 61
13. B. Khoshnood A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000 British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111 2004 485 490
14. D. Collingridge, and C. Reeve Science Speaks to Power. The Role of Experts in Policy Making 1986 France Pinters Publishers
15. M. Steffen Genèse et conduite des politiques sociales S. Aymé Handicap et Vieillissement: Politiques Publiques et Pratiques Sociales 1996 INSERM Editions 95 103
16. Briard M.L. (2003) Organisation du diagnostic prenatal en France. In Diagnostic prenatal, pratiques et enjeux, (M. Dommergues et al, eds), INSERM Editions, 417-452
17. H. Becker Outsiders 1963 Free Press of Glencoe
18. W. Farrant Who's for amniocentesis? The politics of prenatal screening H. Homans The sexual politics of reproduction 1985 Gower 96 122
19. Cl. Julian-Reynier Acceptabilité sociale du diagnostic prénatal: l'exemple de la trisomie 21 Médecine/Sciences 12 1996 333 339
20. T. Shakespeare Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality Disabil. Soc. 13 1998 665 681
21. B. Heyman, and M. Henriksen Risk, age and pregnancy. A case study of prenatal genetic screening and testing 2001 Palgrave
22. B. Katz Rothman The tentative pregnancy. Amniocentesis and the sexual politics of motherhood 1988 Pandora
23. R. Rapp Testing Women, Testing the Fœtus 2000 Routledge
24. B. Simon-Bouy Les marqueurs de la trisomie 21 Contraception, Fertilité, Sexualité 27 1999 589 591
25. D. Smith Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down's syndrome: the gap between policy and practice British Medical Journal 309 1994 776
26. N. Press, and C.H. Browner Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis Soc. Sci. Med. 45 1997 979 989
27. J. Thornton Should health screening be private? 1999 IEA Health and Welfare Unit
28. A. Dusart La détection des anomalies fœtales. Analyse sociologique 1995 Editions du CTNERHI
29. T.M. Marteau Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed Public Health 106 1992 131 141
30. Cl. Williams Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing? Soc. Sci. Med. 54 2002 339 347
31. J.F. Mattéi Le diagnostic prénatal 2000 Flammarion
32. S. Markens Because of the risks: how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening Soc. Sci. Med. 49 1999 359 369
33. J. Milliez L'euthanasie du fœtus. Médecine ou eugénisme? 1999 Editions Odile Jacob Paris
34. B. Khoshood Socioeconomic barriers to informed decision making regarding maternal serum screening for DS. Results of the French National Perinatal Survey of 1998 Am. J. Public Health 94 2004 484 491
35. M. Reid The diffusion of four prenatal screening tests across Europe 1991 King's Fund Centre
36. V. Boissonnat Fausses évidences et vrais dilemmes en santé publique: le dépistage radiologique des cancers du sein Santé Publique 16 2004 9 20
37. Foster, P. (1998) Informed consent in practice, in Feminist perspectives on health care law, (S. Sheldon and M. Thomson) London, Cavendish Publishing, pp. 53-69
38. D. Moyse Le risque de naître différent Esprit 259 1999 65 74
39. J. Testart Les hommes probables. De la procréation aléatoire à la reproduction normative 1999 Seuil Editions Paris