Black-hole polarization and cosmic censorship

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 1999, Pages

  Hod, Shahar ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18144406554     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104031     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969).
2. J.D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3292 (1974).
3. J.D. Bekenstein and C. Rosenzweig, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7239 (1994).
4. W. A. Hiscock, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 131, 245 (1981).
5. B. Carter, Phys. Rev. 174, 1559 (1968).
6. Our task is to challenge the validity of the cosmic censorship conjecture in the most “dangerous” situation, i.e., when the charge-to-energy ratio of the particle is as large as possible. Therefore, we consider a body which is captured from a radial turning point of its motion. This minimizes the energy delivered to the black hole (for a given charge of the body).
7. B. Linet, J. Phys. A 9, 1081 (1976).
8. J. D. Bekenstein and A. E. Mayo, Phys. Rev. D (to be published), e-print gr-qc/9903002.
9. C.M. DeWitt and B.S. DeWitt, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 3 (1964).
10. F.A. Berends and R. Gastmans, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 98, 225 (1976).
11. C.H. MacGruder III, Nature (London) 272, 806 (1978).
12. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 20, 373 (1979).
13. A.G. Smith and C.M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1276 (1980).
14. A.I. Zel’nikov and V.P. Frolov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 82, 321 (1982) [Sov. Phys. JETP 55, 191 (1982)].
15. D. Lohiya, J. Phys. A 15, 1815 (1982).
16. B. Léauté and B. Linet, J. Phys. A 15, 1821 (1982).
17. B. Léauté and B. Linet, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 67 (1983).
18. J.D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2333 (1973).
19. B. Wang, R.K. Su, P.K.N. Yu, and E.C.M. Young, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5284 (1998).