Bridge annual maintenance prioritization under uncertainty by multiobjective combinatorial optimization

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 343-353

  Liu, Min ^a   Frangopol, Dan M ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMBINATORIAL MATHEMATICS; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE; CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURES; COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; MAINTENANCE PLANNING;

BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; MAINTENANCE;

EID: 18144397346     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00401.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Das, P. C. (1999), Prioritisation of bridge maintenance needs, in D. M. Frangopol (ed.). Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 26-44.
2. DB12/01 (2001), The assessment of highway bridge structures. Highways Agency Standard for Bridge Assessment, London, UK.
3. Deb, K. (2001), Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
4. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agrawal, S. & Meyarivan, T. (2002), A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2),182-97.
5. Denton, S. (2002), Data Estimates for Different Maintenance Options for Reinforced Concrete Cross Heads (Personal Communication), Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd., Bristol, UK.
6. Enright, M. P & Frangopol, D. M. (1999), Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using Bayesian updating, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(10), 1118-25.
7. Frangopol, D. M., Enright, M. P., Gharaibeh, E. & Estes, A. C. (1999), Towards optimal reliability-based bridge maintenance planning, in D. M. Frangopol (ed.), Case Studies in Optimal Design and Maintenance Planning of Civil Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, Reston, VA, 73-88.
8. Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S. & Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001), Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges, ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 27-47.
9. Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K.-Y & Estes, A. C. (1997), Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(10), 1390-401.
10. Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Fukuda, Y. & Frangopol, D. M. (2004), Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure systems: life cycle cost vs. safety level vs. service life, in D. M. Frangopol, E. Brühwiler, M. H. Faber, and B. Adey, (eds.), Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structures: Assessment, Design and Management, ASCE, Reston, VA, 19-25
11. Goldberg, D. E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
12. Kong, J. S. (2001), Lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
13. Kong, J. S. & Frangopol, D. M. (2003), Life-cycle reliability based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(6), 818-28.
14. Liu, C., Hammad, A. & Itoh, Y. (1997), Multiobjective optimization of bridge deck rehabilitation using a genetic algorithm, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 12, 431-43.
15. Liu, M. & Frangopol, D. M. (2004), Probabilistic maintenance prioritization for deteriorating bridges using a multiobjective genetic algorithm, in Proceedings of the Ninth ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Albuquerque, NM, July 26-8.
16. Liu, M. & Frangopol, D. M. (2005), Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety, and life-cycle cost, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(5), 833-42.
17. Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K. & Nakamura, H. (2000), Bridge system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 45-55.