Variational description of mott insulators

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Capello, Manuela ^a,b   Becca, Federico ^a,b   Fabrizio, Michele ^a,b,c   Sorella, Sandro ^a,b   Tosatti, Erio ^a,b,c  

^a SISSA   (Italy)

^b DEMOCRITOS NATIONAL SIMULATION CENTER   (Italy)

^c ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE STRUCTURE; MOTT INSULATORS; REPULSIONS; VARIATIONAL ENERGIES;

DIMERIZATION; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; HAMILTONIANS; MAGNETIZATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

METAL INSULATOR TRANSITION;

EID: 18144393124     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.026406     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. N. F. Mott, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 62, 416 (1949).
2. M. C. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159 (1963).
3. H. Yokoyama and H. Shiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56, 1490 (1987).
4. M. Dzierzawa et al., Helv. Phys. Acta 70, 124 (1997).
5. F. Gebhard, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9452 (1990).
6. H. Yokoyama and H. Shiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59, 3669 (1990).
7. P. Fazekas and K. Penc, Int J. Mod. Phys. B 1, 1021 (1988).
8. See, however, H. Yokoyama et al., cond-mat/0308264.
9. A. Georges et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996); G. Kotliar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001). Within dynamical mean-field theory, or its cluster generalizations, the counterpart of real-space holon-doublon binding is a binding in the time domain, a simple manifestation of the Mott-Hubbard gap.
10. A. Georges et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996); G. Kotliar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001). Within dynamical mean-field theory, or its cluster generalizations, the counterpart of real-space holon-doublon binding is a binding in the time domain, a simple manifestation of the Mott-Hubbard gap.
11. M. Fabrizio, Phys. Rev. B 54, 10054 (1996).
12. R. Arita et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, 10324 (1998); K. Kuroki et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 3371 (1997).
13. R. Arita et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, 10324 (1998); K. Kuroki et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 3371 (1997).
14. S. Daul and R. M. Noack, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1646 (2000).
15. A. J. Millis and S. N. Coppersmith, Phys. Rev. B 43, 13 770 (1991).
16. L. Reatto and G. V. Chester, Phys. Rev. 155, 88 (1967).
17. S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 64, 024512 (2001).
18. R. Resta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1800 (1998).
19. S. Sorella et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002).
20. C. Gros et al., Phys. Rev. B 36, 381 (1987).