The essence of telehealth readiness in rural communities: An organizational perspective

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 137-145

  Jennett, Penny ^a   Jackson, Andora ^a   Ho, Kendall ^b   Healy, Theresa ^c   Kazanjian, Arminee ^b   Woollard, Robert ^b   Haydt, Susan ^a   Bates, Joanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; PATIENT TREATMENT; RURAL AREAS; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

PUBLIC COMMUNITIES; REMOTE COMMUNITIES; RURAL COMMUNITIES; TELEHEALTH SERVICES;

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMMUNITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; ORGANIZATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHENOMENOLOGY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RURAL HEALTH CARE; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 18144376274     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2005.11.137     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Reid J. A telemedicine primer: Understanding the issues. Billings, MT: Artcraft Printers, 1996.
2. Schofield J. Virtually caring: Organizational consequences of distance mediated care (RP0033). Birmingham, UK: Aston Business School Research Institute, Aston University, 2000.
3. Aas IHM. A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:18-26.
4. Aas IHM. Telemedicine and the organization of the health sector. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5(Suppl 1):26-28.
5. Southon FCG, Sauer C, Dampney CNG. Information technology in complex health services: Organizational impediments to successful technology transfer and diffusion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997,4:112-124.
6. Doolittle GC. Telemedicine in Kansas: The successes and the challenges. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7(Suppl 2):43-46.
7. Heidegger M. Being and time. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
8. Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
9. Benner P. Quality of life: A phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction, and understanding in nursing science. Adv Nurs Sci 1996;8:1-14.
10. Weiss C. Understanding the program. In Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
11. Jennett P, Jackson A, Healy T, Kazanjian A, Woollard R, Haydt S, Bates J. Alliance for Building Capacity-Framework for Remote and Rural Readiness in Telehealth. Final Report for CANARIE, June 2002. http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/ telehealth/Projects-Canarie-Final%20Report,%20Appendix%20A.htm. Last Accessed January 24, 2005.
12. Maidique M, Zirger B. A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 1984;4:192-203.
13. Armenakis AA, Harris SG, Mossholder KW. Creating readiness for organizational change. Hum Relat 1993;46:681-703.
14. Romano CA. Predictors of nurse adoption of a computer information system as an innovation. In: Greenes R, et al. eds. Proceedings of MEDINFO '95 1995:1335-1339.
15. Ash J. (1997). Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:102-111.