Rescher's principle of decreasing marginal returns of scientific research

Scientometrics

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 419-436

  Wagner Döbler, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044400734     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010506730809     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. N. RESCHER, Scientific Progress, Pittsburgh Univ. Pr., Pittsburgh, Pa., 1978. German ed.: Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1982. French ed.: Le Progrès Scientifique, Presses Universitaires France, Paris, 1993.
2. N. RESCHER, Scientific Progress, Pittsburgh Univ. Pr., Pittsburgh, Pa., 1978. German ed.: Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1982. French ed.: Le Progrès Scientifique, Presses Universitaires France, Paris, 1993.
3. N. RESCHER, Scientific Progress, Pittsburgh Univ. Pr., Pittsburgh, Pa., 1978. German ed.: Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1982. French ed.: Le Progrès Scientifique, Presses Universitaires France, Paris, 1993.
4. C. S. PEIRCE, Economy of research. In: Peirce: Collected Papers, Vol. 7, Harvard Univ. Pr., Cambridge, 1958, 76-83. Later reflections, 84-88. First 1879 and 1902.
5. S. TOULMIN, The intellectual authority and the social context of the scientific enterprise: Holton, Rescher and Lakatos, Minerva, 18 (1980), 652-667.
6. K. E. BOULDlNG, Review of N. Rescher: Scientific Progress, International Journal of General Systems, 6 (1980), 173-174.
7. L. VAIZEY, Review of N. Rescher: Scientific Progress, Journal of Economic Literature, 17 (1979), 1070-1071.
8. A. SCHUBERT, Review of N. Rescher: Scientific Progress, Scientometrics, 5 (1983), 135-136.
9. N. RESCHER, Cognitive Economy: The Economic Dimension of the Theory of Knowledge, Univ. of Pittsburgh Pr., Pittsburgh, 1989.
10. J. WOLF, Die Volkswirtschaft der Gegenwart und Zukunft, Deichert, Leipzig, 1912.
11. S. S. KUZNETS, Secular Movements in Production and Prices, Riverside Pr., Boston, 1930, Repr. Kelley, New York, 1967.
12. E. W. HULME, Statistical Bibliography in Relation to the Growth of Modern Civilization, printed by Butler & Tanner, London, 1923.
13. O. GIARINI, H. LOUBERGÉ, The Diminishing Returns of Technology, Pergamon Pr., Oxford, 1978.
14. G. SILVERBERG, L. SOETE, Introduction, in: The Economics of Growth and Technical Change, Aldershot 1994, 1-5; p. 2.
15. I. NIINILUOTO, Scientific progress, Synthese, 45 (1980), 427-462.
16. 6).
17. R. WAGNER-DÖBLER, Publikationsverhalten gestern und heute: 15000 Autoren einer mathematischen Spezialdisziplin auf dem Prüfstand, In: W. NEUBAUER, K.-H. MEIER (Eds), Technik und Information, Dt. Dokumentartag 1992, DGD, Frankfurt a.M., 1993, with further references.
18. W. GOFFMAN, K. S. WARREN, Scientific Information Systems and the Prinicple of Selectivity, Praeger, New York, 1980; pp. 134-136.
19. R. WAGNER-DÖBLER, Wachstumszyklen technisch-wissenschaftlicher Kreativität, Eine quantitative Studie unter besonderer Beachtung der Mathematik, Campus-Verl., Frankfurt/M., 1997.
20. S. COLE, Making Science, Harvard Univ. Pr., Cambridge, 1992; Ch. 7.
21. H. W. HOLUB, G. TAPPEINER, V. EBERHARTER, The Iron Law of Important Articles, Southern Economic Journal, 58 (1991), 317-328.
22. R. M. GASCOIGNE, A Historical Catalogue of Scientists and Scientific Books, From the Earlist Times to the Close of the Nineteenth Century, Garland, New York, 1984.
23. According to an extensive bibliometric study of 19th-century physics based on the physics index (including mechanics) of the Catalogue of Scientific Papers: R. WAGNER-DOBLER, J. BERG, 19th-century physics, A quantitative outline, Scientometrics, 46 (1999), 213-285. As the title of the source says, only contributions to journals are considered. The number of authors who produced only in the form of monographs should be of no statistical significance; Ref. 22.
24. R. WAGNER-DÖBLER, J. BERG, Nineteenth-century mathematics in the mirror of its literature. A quantitative approach, Historia Mathematica, 23 (1996), 288-318.
25. R. WAGNER-DÖBLER, Alter und intellektuelle Produktivität: Das Beispiel von Mathematikern, Logikern und Schachmeistern, Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie, 9 (1996), 277-290.
26. K. O. MAY, Growth and quality of the mathematical literature, Isis, 59 (1968), 363-371.
27. R. WAGNER-DÖBLER, J. BERG, Mathematische Logik von 1847 bis zur Gegenwart, Eine bibliometrische Untersuchung, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993.
28. 0.75 = 331).
29. B. GLASS, Milestones and rates of grwoth in the development of biology, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 54 (1979) March, 31-53.
30. F. STUHLHOFER, Does the rate of growth of our knowledge depend on the quality-level considered?, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B, 36 (1986), 154-156.
31. G. S. CARR, Formulas and Theorems in Pure Mathematics, 2nd ed., Chelsea, New York, N.Y., 1970. First published in 1886 under the title: CARR, A Synopsis of Elementary Results in Pure Mathematics.
32. G. S. CARR, Formulas and Theorems in Pure Mathematics, 2nd ed., Chelsea, New York, N.Y., 1970. First published in 1886 under the title: CARR, A Synopsis of Elementary Results in Pure Mathematics.
33. J. SCHUMMER, Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, Scientometrics, 39 (1997), 107-123.
34. M. L. PAO, An empiricial examination of Lotka's law, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (1986), 26-33.
35. J. BERG, R. WAGNER-DÖBLER, A multidimensional analysis of scientific dynamics, Part 1, Case studies of mathematical logic in the 20th century, Scientometrics, 35 (1996), 321-346.
36. There is nothing miraculous in the existence of cycles in science and technology. A miracle would be the regular occurrence of cycles of a fixed length of, e.g., 50 years, the so-called Kondratiev cycles; but the observable cycles are not as regular.
37. J. HORGAN, The End of Science. Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1996. German ed.: Horgan: An den Grenzen des Wissens. Siegeszug und Dilemma der Naturwissenschaften, Luchterhand, München 1997. About Rescher see German ed., pp. 53ff. Cf. the debate between Horgan and Paul Hoffman in Time, April 10, 2000, pp. 74-75 ("Will there be anything left to discover?").
38. J. HORGAN, The End of Science. Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1996. German ed.: Horgan: An den Grenzen des Wissens. Siegeszug und Dilemma der Naturwissenschaften, Luchterhand, München 1997. About Rescher see German ed., pp. 53ff. Cf. the debate between Horgan and Paul Hoffman in Time, April 10, 2000, pp. 74-75 ("Will there be anything left to discover?").
39. J. HORGAN, The End of Science. Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1996. German ed.: Horgan: An den Grenzen des Wissens. Siegeszug und Dilemma der Naturwissenschaften, Luchterhand, München 1997. About Rescher see German ed., pp. 53ff. Cf. the debate between Horgan and Paul Hoffman in Time, April 10, 2000, pp. 74-75 ("Will there be anything left to discover?").