The WANDAML markup language for digital document annotation

Proceedings - International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, IWFHR

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 563-568

  Franke, Katrin ^a   Schomaker, Lambert ^b   Guyon, Isabelle ^c   Vuurpijl, Louis ^d  

^a FRAUNHOFER FOKUS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c ClopiNet   (United States)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Annotations; Data format; Document analysis; Forensic data; Handwriting; XML

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATIONS; DATA FORMAT; DOCUMENT ANALYSIS; FORENSIC DATA; HANDWRITING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; GRAPHIC METHODS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; VECTORS;

XML;

EID: 18044395716     PISSN: 15505235     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IWFHR.2004.104     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. A data standard for the annotation and storage of handwriting samples in the context of (computer-based) forensic handwriting analysis and writer identification. Technical report, http://www.unipen.org/wandaML/, 2003.
2. W. de Jong, et al. Computer aided analysis of handwriting, the NIFO-TNO approach. In 4th European Handwriting Conference for Police and Gov. Handwriting Experts, 1994.
3. Ink Markup Language W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/tr/inkml/.
4. XML extensible Markup Language. http://www.w3.org/xml/.
5. K. Franke, et al. Wanda: A common ground for forensic handwriting examination and writer identification. ENFHEX news - Bulletin of the European Network of Forensic Handwriting Experts, (1/04, ISSN-1456-1469).
6. K. Franke, et al. Wanda: A generic framework applied in forensic handwriting analysis and writer identification. In A. Abraham, et al, editor, Proc. 3rd International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, pages 927-938, Amsterdam, 2003.
7. I. Guyon, L.R.B. Schomaker, R. Plamondon, M. Liberman, and S. Janet. UNIPEN project of on-line data exchange and benchmarks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IAPR-IEEE, http://www.unipen.org, 1994.
8. O. Hilton. Scientific Examination of Questiones Documents. CRC Serie in Forensic and Police Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C., (revised edition) edition, 1993.
9. R.A. Huber and A.M. Headrick. Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York, 1999.
10. T. Kanungo, C.H. Lee, J. Czorapinski, and I. Bella. Trueviz: a groundtruth/metadata editing and visualizing toolkit for ocr. In SPIE Conference on Document Recognition and Retrieval. http://www.cfar.umd.edu/~kanungo/ software/trueviz-102.tar.gz, 2001.
11. U. Marti and H. Bunke. A full english sentence database for off-line handwriting recognition. In 5th Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR'99, pages 705-708, Bangalore, India, 1999. http://www.iam.unibe.ch/ zimmerma/iamdb/iamdb.html.
12. M. Philipp. Expected future developments in the Forensic Information System Handwriting. In 4th Euro. Conf. for Police and Gov. Handwg. Experts, London, UK, 1994.
13. N. Roussel, et al. Web-based cooperative document understanding. In 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Doc. Ana. and Rec., pages 368-373. http://xmillum. sourceforge.net/, 2001.
14. L.R.B. Schomaker and L.G. Vuurpijl. Forensic writer identification: A benchmark data set and a comparison of two systems. Technical report, Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2000.
15. M. van Erp, L.G. Vuurpijl, K. Franke, and L.R.B. Schomaker. The wanda measurement tool for forensic document examination. In 11th Conf. of the Int. Graphonomics Sty., pages 282-285, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 2003.