Flux tube zero-point motion, hadronic charge radii, and hybrid meson production cross sections

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 60, Issue 11, 1999, Pages

  Isgur, Nathan ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044387033     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.114016     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. N. Isgur and J. Paton, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2910 (1985).
2. For a recent review of both lattice and analytic approaches to flux tubes, see Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum II, edited by N. Brambilla and G. M. Prosperi (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997);and Confinement III, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum, Jefferson Lab, 1998, edited by N. Isgur (World Scientific, Singapore, in press).
3. E852 Collaboration, D. R. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1630 (1997).
4. G. T. Condo, Phys. Rev. D 43, 2787 (1991)
5. The Omega Photon Collaboration, M. Atkinson, Z. Phys. C 34, 157 (1987)
6. G. R. Blackett, hep-ex/9708032;CLAS Collaboration, G. Adams et al., “Exotic Meson Spectroscopy with CLAS,” CEBAF proposal E-94-121;I. Aznauryan et al., “Search for (Formula presented) Exotic Mesons …,” CEBAF proposal E-94-118.
7. N. Isgur, R. Kokoski, and J. Paton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 869 (1985).
8. F. E. Close and P. R. Page, Nucl. Phys. B443, 233 (1995)
9. F. E. CloseP. R. PagePhys. Rev. D 52, 1706 (1995)
10. Phys. Rev. DT. Barnes, F. E. Close, and E. S. Swanson, 52, 5242 (1995).
11. A. Afanasev and P. R. Page, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6771 (1998).
12. J. D. Bjorken, in Proceedings of the(Formula presented)Rencontre de Physique de la Vallee d’Aoste, La Thuile, Italy, 1990, edited by M. Greco (Editions Frontieres, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1990)
13. J. D. Bjorken, in Proceedings of the XXVth International Conference on High Energy Physics, Singapore, 1990, edited by K. K. Phua and Y. Yamaguchi (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
14. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 43, 819 (1991).
15. For the original papers see N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 232, 113 (1989)
16. Phys. Lett. BN. IsgurM. B. Wise237, 527 (1990).
17. For an overview of heavy quark symmetry see N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, in B Decays, edited by S. Stone (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), p. 158;in Heavy Flavors, edited by A. J. Buras and M. Lindner (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 234.
18. N. Cabibbo and L. Radicati, Phys. Lett. 19, 697 (1966).
19. D. Scora and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2783 (1995).
20. Phys. Rev. DThe authors present an updated version of the ISGW model of N. Isgur, D. Scora, B. Grinstein, and M. B. Wise, 39, 799 (1989), called ISGW2.
21. See, e.g., the discussion of relativistic corrections to charge radii in Ref. 12 and the sources cited therein.
22. Edward M. Purcell, Electricity and Magnetism (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964), pp. 163–167.
23. F. E. Close (private communication)cogently advocates using the term “strong QCD” instead of the negative “nonperturbative QCD.”
24. R. Kokoski and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 35, 907 (1987).
25. For the connection between the Sudakov form factor, the heavy quark velocity-dependent anomalous dimension 18, and kinks in Wilson lines, see G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 279, 359 (1992); for work on each of these topics, see the references quoted therein.
26. A. F. Falk, H. Georgi, B. Grinstein, and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B343, 1 (1990).
27. N. Isgur, Phys. Lett. B 448, 111 (1999).
28. M. J. Dugan and B. Grinstein, Phys. Lett. B 257, 399 (1991)
29. C. Reader and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1007 (1993);for a review see M. Neubert, V. Rieckert, B. Stech, and Q. P. Xu, in Heavy Flavors 10, p. 286.
30. F. E. Close, I. Dunietz, P. R. Page, S. Veseli, and H. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5653 (1998)
31. Phys. Rev. DG. Chiladze, A. F. Falk, and A. A. Petrov, 58, 034013 (1998). I am grateful to Philip Page for bringing these papers to my attention.
32. J. D. Sullivan, Phys. Rev. D 5, 1732 (1972).