Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the woodcock reading mastery tests-revised with special education students

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 561-567

  Williams, Thomas Oliver ^a   Eaves, Ronald C ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044386224     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.1043     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Algozzine, B., Eaves, R., Mann, L., & Vance, R.H. (1993). Slosson Full-Range Intelligence Test. Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
2. Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1995-99). AMOS 4.0 users guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.
3. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4. Bentler, P.M. (1993). EQS: Structural equations program manual (version 4.0). Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
5. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
6. Eaves, R.C. (1989-1990). Review of Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised (WRMT-R). Diagnostique Monograph: Assessment for the 1990s: Critical reviews of recent instruments, 15, 277-298.
7. Fornell, C. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 443-448.
8. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Green, S.B., Akey, T.M., Flemming, K.K., Hershberger, S.C., & Marquis, J.C. (1997). Effect of the number of scale points on chi-square fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 108-120.
10. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 users reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
12. Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
13. National Forum Foundation. (no date). Correlations between the WRMT-R and the K-ABC (Research Report No. WRMT-R-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14. Saltstone, R., Tayler, S.M., & Fraboni, M. (1989). A note of the Word Identification subtest of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised: Different classifications consequences of Forms G and H. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 7, 343-345.
15. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1998). Assessment (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
16. SPSS 10.0 for Windows [software application]. (2000). Chicago, IL: Prentice Hall.
17. Sutton, J.P. (1998-1999). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised Normative Update (WRMT-R/NU). Diagnostique Monograph: Assessment for the new decade, 24, 299-316.
18. Takana, J.S., & Huba, G.L. (1985). A fit index for covariance structural models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 223-239.
19. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1963). Methodology and scores of socioeconomic status. Working paper No. 15. Washington, DC: Author.
20. Williams, T.O., Jr., Eaves, R.C., & Cox, C. (2000). Factor structure of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised, Forms G and H. In Submission.
21. Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised examiners manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
22. Woodcock, R.W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised Normative Update: Examiners manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
23. Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Test Battery. Allen, TX: DLM/ Teaching Resources.