Age-related differences in susceptibility to carcinogenesis. II. Approaches for application and uncertainty analyses for individual genetically acting carcinogens

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 509-516

  Hattis, Dale ^a   Goble, Robert ^a   Chu, Margaret ^b  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carcinogenesis; Fetal; Mutagenic chemicals; Risk assessment; Susceptibility; Uncertainties

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGEN;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; LIFE CYCLE; MALE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RODENT;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; CARCINOGENS; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; FEMALE; GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTAGENS; NEOPLASMS; RATS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; UNCERTAINTY;

RODENTIA;

EID: 18044376877     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7564     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brennan T, Dawson J, Firestone M, Hammerstrom K, Hubal E, Kennedy P, et al. 2003. Guidance on Selecting the Appropriate Age Groups for Assessing Childhood Exposures to Environmental Contaminants. Report of a Risk Assessment Forum Technical Panel. EPA/630/P-03/003A, February 2003 External Review Draft. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
2. Brown KG, Hoel DG. 1986. Statistical modeling of animal bioassay data with variable dosing regimens: example - vinyl chloride. Risk Anal 6:155-166.
3. Day NE, Brown CC. 1980. Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 64:977-989.
4. 6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase in mammalian cells. Cancer Res 52:1804-1809.
5. Chanas B, Wang H, Ghanayem BI. 2003. Differential metabolism of acrylonitrile to cyanide is responsible for greater sensitivity of male vs female mice: role of CYP2E1 and epoxide hydrolases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 193:293-302.
6. Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. 1996. Public law 104-170.
7. Gentry PR, Haber L, Covington T, Zhao Q, Nance P, Clewell HJ III. 2003. Physiological Parameters for Neonatal Mice and Neonatal Sprague-Dawley Rats: Data for PBPK Modeling. EPA No. 2C-R131-NTNA. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
8. Ginsberg GL. 2003. Assessing cancer risks from short-term exposures in children. Risk Anal 23:19-34.
9. Hattis D. 2004. Human Interindividual Variability in Parameters Related to Susceptibility for Toxic Effects. Worcester, MA:Clark University. Available: http://www2.clarku.edu/faculty/dhattis [accessed 5 January 2005].
10. Hattis D, Burmaster DE. 1994. Assessment of variability and uncertainty distributions for practical risk analyses. Risk Anal 14:713-730.
11. Hattis D, Goble R, Russ A, Chu M, Ericson J. 2004. Age-related differences in susceptibility to carcinogenesis - a quantitative analysis of empirical animal bioassay data. Environ Health Perspect 112:1152-1158.
12. Kilborn SH, Trudel G, Unthoff H. 2002. Review of growth plate closure compared with age at sexual maturity and lifespan in laboratory animals. Contemp Top Lab Animal Sci 41(5):21-26.
13. Meranze DR, Gruenstein M, Shimkin ME. (1969) Effect of age and sex on the development of neoplasms in Wistar rats receiving a single intragastric instillation of 7,12-dimethyl-benz(a)anthracene. Int J Cancer 4:480-486.
14. Mugford CA, Kedderis GL. 1998. Sex-dependent metabolism of xenobiotics. Drug Metab Rev 30(3):441-498.
15. National Center for Health Statistics. 1996. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, NHANES III Public Use Data File Documentation No. 76200. Hyattsville, MD:National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
16. Nomura T. 1976. Comparison of tumour susceptibility among various organs of foetal, young and adult ICR/Jcl mice. Br J Cancer 33:521-533.
17. NTP. 1999. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Pentachlorophenol (CAS No. 87-86-5) in F344/N Rats (Feed Studies). NTP Technical Report 483. Research Triangle Park, NC:National Toxicology Program.
18. Pampori NA, Agrawal AK, Shapiro BH. 2001. Infusion of gender-dependent plasma growth hormone profiles into intact rats: effects of subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intravenous routes of rat and human growth hormone on endogenous circulating growth hormone profiles and expression of sexually dimorphic hepatic cyp isoforms. Drug Metab Dispos 29(1):8-16.
19. Pampori NA, Shapiro BH. 1994. Effects of neonatally administered monosodium glutamate on the sexually dimorphic profiles of circulating growth hormone regulating murine hepatic monooxygenases. Biochem Pharmacol 47(7):1221-1229.
20. Pierce DA, Mendelsohn ML. 1999. A model for radiation-related cancer suggested by the atomic bomb survivor data. Radiat Res 152:642-654.
21. Potter EL, Craig JM. 1975. Pathology of the Fetus and the Infant. 3rd ed. Chicago:Year Book Medical Publishers.
22. Preston DL, Shimizo Y, Pierce DA, Syama A, Mabuchi K. 2003. Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. Radiat Res 160:381-407.
23. Russo J, Calaf G, Roi L, Russo IH. 1987. Influence of age and gland topography on cell kinetics of normal human breast tissue. J Natl Cancer Inst 78:413-418.
24. Russo J, Russo IH. 1999. Cellular basis of breast cancer susceptibility. Oncol Res 11:169-179.
25. Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996. 1996. Public Law 104-182.
26. Shapiro BH, Agrawal AK, Pampori NA. 1995. Gender differences in drug metabolism regulated by growth hormone. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27(1):9-20.
27. Sunderman FW, Boerner F. 1949. Normal Values in Clinical Medicine. Philadelphia:W. B. Saunders Company.
28. U.S. EPA. 1999. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Review Draft. NCEA-F-0644. Washington, DC:Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum.
29. U.S. EPA. 2003. Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens (External Review Draft). Washington, DC:Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=55446 [accessed 11 May 2004].
30. Whittemore A. 1977. The age distribution of human cancer for carcinogenic exposures of varying intensity. Am J Epidemiol 106:418-432.