Shape of temperature dependence of spontaneous magnetization of ferromagnets: Quantitative analysis

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 10, 2005, Pages

  Kuz'min, M D ^a  

^a IFW DRESDEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURIE TEMPERATURE; HESEINBERG MODEL; QUANTUM NUMBERS; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

DATA REDUCTION; FERMI LEVEL; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SINGLE CRYSTALS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

MAGNETIZATION;

EID: 18044374640     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.107204     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. V.L. Moruzzi, and P.M. Marcus, in Handbook of Magnetic Materials, edited by K. H. J. Buschow (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993), Vol. 7, Chap. 2.
2. N.M. Rosengaard, and B. Johansson, Phys. Rev. B 55, 14975 (1997).
3. M. Pajda, J. Kudrnovský, I. Turek, V. Drchal, and P. Bruno, Phys. Rev. B 64, 174402 (2001).
4. H. P. Myers, and W. Sucksmith, Proc. R. Soc. London A 207, 427 (1951).
5. J. Crangle, Philos. Mag. 46, 499 (1955).
6. A. H. Morrish, The Physical Principles of Magnetism (Wiley, New York, 1965).
7. A. Aharoni, Introduction to the Theory of Ferromagnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996), Chap. 2.
8. U. Köhler, A. Hoser, and D. Hupfeld, Physica (Amsterdam) 328B, 276 (2003).
9. U. Köhler, J. Englich, O. Hupe, and J. Hesse, Physica (Amsterdam) 339B, 156 (2003).
10. E. Callen and H. B. Callen, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1140 (1965).
11. J. Crangle and G.M. Goodman, Proc. R. Soc. London A 321, 477 (1971).
12. R. Pauthenet, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8187 (1982).
13. P. Weiss and R. Forrer, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 5, 153 (1926).
14. H.E. Nigh, S. Legvold, and F.H. Spedding, Phys. Rev. 132, 1092 (1963).
15. H.P. Klein, A. Menth, and R.S. Perkins, Physica (Amsterdam) 80B, 153 (1975).
16. F. Givord, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble, 1969.
17. J. Rouchy, P. Morin, and E. du Tremolet de Lacheisserie, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 23, 59 (1981).
18. F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 102, 1230 (1956).
19. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1996), Chap. 15.
20. E. Janke, F. Emde, and F. Loesch, Tables of Higher Functions (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960).
21. S. V. Halilov, H. Eschrig, A. Y. Perlov, and P. M. Oppeneer, Phys. Rev. B 58, 293 (1998).
22. P. W. Mitchell, and D. McK. Paul, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3272 (1985).
23. C.-K. Loong, J. M. Carpenter, J. W. Lynn, R. A. Robinson, and H.A. Mook, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1895 (1984).
24. G. Shirane, V.J. Minkiewicz, and R. Nathans, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 383 (1968).
25. W.C. Koehler, H.R. Child, R.M. Nicklow, H.G. Smith, R.M. Moon, and J.W. Cable, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 16 (1970).
26. 1(T = 0) ≠ 0; see Figs. 6-8 of Ref. [2].
27. G.S. Rushbrooke and P.J. Wood, Mol. Phys. 1, 257 (1958).
28. The use of the classical approximation in the spin-wave theory is beyond reproach, since there it is limited to long wavelengths, q → 0.
29. 17 as one-sublattice ferromagnets, making no distinction between the Co or Fe atoms occupying crystallographically non-equivalent sites. Validity of this approximation is not immediately obvious and needs to be established experimentally. However, the fact that no visible anomaly of m(τ) accompanies the hcp-fcc transition in cobalt, Fig. 1(c), speaks in favor of such a simplification.