Nonresonant semileptonic heavy quark decay

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 1999, Pages

  Isgur, Nathan ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044372420     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.074030     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974)
2. Nucl. Phys.E. Witten, B160, 57 (1979).
3. N. Isgur, D. Scora, B. Grinstein, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 39, 799 (1989);B. Grinstein, M.B. Wise, and N. Isgur, Caltech Report No. CALT-68-1311 and University of Toronto Report No. UTPT-85-37, 1985
4. B. Grinstein, M. B. Wise, and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 298 (1986).
5. D. Scora and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2783 (1995) present an updated version of the ISGW model of Ref. 2 called ISGW2.
6. P. Geiger and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1595 (1990).
7. P. Geiger and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 44, 799 (1991)
8. P. GeigerN. IsgurPhys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1066 (1991)
9. P. GeigerN. IsgurPhys. Rev. D 47, 5050 (1993)
10. Phys. Rev. DP. Geiger, 49, 6003 (1993).
11. P. Geiger and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 55, 299 (1997).
12. F.E. Close (private communication)cogently advocates using the term “strong QCD” instead of the negative “nonperturbative QCD.”
13. N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 232, 113 (1989)
14. Phys. Lett. BN. IsgurM.B. Wise237, 527 (1990).
15. For an overview of heavy quark symmetry, see N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, in B Decays, edited by S. Stone (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), p. 158;and in Heavy Flavors, edited by A.J. Buras and M. Lindner (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 234.
16. N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1130 (1991).
17. See, e.g., J. Zeng, J.W. Van Orden, and W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5229 (1995) and references therein.
18. See, e.g., J.L. Goity and W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3459 (1995) and references therein.
19. Particle Data Group, C. Caso, Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
20. N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5896 (1996).
21. A.F. Falk, M. Luke, and M.J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6316 (1996).
22. Experiments report a wide range of values for (Formula presented). Reference 12 gives a “world average” value of (Formula presented) in excellent agreement with ISGW2 3, but experiments quote inconsistent values from (Formula presented) [ALEPH Collaboration, D. Buskuvic, Phys. Lett. B 395, 373 (1997)] to (Formula presented)
23. [ARGUS Collaboration, H. Albrecht, Z. Phys. C 57, 533 (1993)].I will use the round number (Formula presented), which is within one standard deviation of the most accurate reported measurement of (Formula presented) [CLEO Collaboration, A. Anastassov et al. (CLEO), CLEO CONF 96-8 (1996)], but conveys the considerable uncertainty remaining in this quantity.
24. J.D. Bjorken, in Proceedings of the 4th Rencontre de Physique de la Vallee d'Aoste, La Thuile, Italy, 1990, edited by M. Greco (Editions Frontier`es, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1990);J. D. Bjorken, Recent Developments in Heavy Flavor Theory, in Proceedings of the XXVth International Conference on High Energy Physics, Singapore (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
25. N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 43, 819 (1991).
26. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5894 (1996).
27. For an overview of heavy quark effective theory, see the review cited in Ref. 4 and the references therein, especially H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 240, 447 (1990)
28. Phys. Lett. BE. Eichten and B. Hill, 234, 511 (1990)
29. M.B. Voloshin and M.A. Shifman, Yad. Fiz. 45, 743 (1987) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45, 463 (1987)]
30. H.D. Politzer and M.B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 206, 681 (1988)
31. Phys. Lett. BH.D. PolitzerM.B. Wise208, 504 (1988)
32. A.F. Falk, H. Georgi, B. Grinstein, and M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B343, 1 (1990)
33. Nucl. Phys.B. Grinstein, B339, 253 (1990)
34. M.B. Wise, in Particles and Fields 3: Proceedings of the Banff Summer Institute (CAP), 1988, edited by N. Kamal and F. Khanna (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), p. 124.
35. For a review of the adiabatic approximation in the context of the flux tube model (based on the results of Refs. 21 and456), see N. Isgur, in Proceedings of Few Body Problems in Physics, edited by F. Gross,AIP Conf. Proc.No. 334 (AIP, New York, 1995), p. 3.
36. For some early discussions of incorporating the nonperturbative effects of (Formula presented) loops (which were all in the context of (Formula presented) spectroscopy and decays), see J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 767 (1975)
37. Phys. Rev. Lett.E. Eichten, 36, 500 (1976)
38. Phys. Rev. Lett.and E.C. Poggio and H.J. Schnitzer, 41, 1344 (1978). These discussions are all different, and each introduces essential elements of the adiabatic approximation adopted in Refs. 21 and 456.
39. N. Isgur and J. Paton, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2910 (1985).
40. N. Isgur, “Beyond the Adiabatic Approximation: the impact of thresholds on the hadronic spectrum,” JLAB-THY-99-01, nucl-th/9901032, 1999.
41. S. Okubo, Phys. Lett. 5, 165 (1963)
42. S. OkuboPhys. Rev. D 16, 2336 (1977);G. Zweig, CERN Report No. 8419 TH 412, 1964; reprinted in Developments in the Quark Theory of Hadrons, edited by D. B. Lichtenberg and S. P. Rosen (Hadronic Press, Massachusetts, 1980)
43. J. Iizuka, K. Okada, and O. Shito, Prog. Theor. Phys. 35, 1061 (1966)
44. J. Iizuka, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37-38, 21 (1966).
45. H.J. Lipkin, Nucl. Phys. B291, 720 (1987)
46. H.J. LipkinPhys. Lett. B 179, 278 (1986)
47. H.J. LipkinNucl. Phys. B244, 147 (1984)
48. H.J. LipkinPhys. Lett. 124B, 509 (1983).
49. L. Micu, Nucl. Phys. B10, 521 (1969)
50. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J.-C. Raynal, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2233 (1973)
51. A. Le YaouancL. OliverO. PeneJ.-C. RaynalPhys. Lett. 71B, 397 (1977)
52. Phys. Lett.A. Le YaouancL. OliverO. PeneJ.-C. Raynal72B, 57 (1977)
53. W. Roberts and B. Silvestre-Brac, Few-Body Syst. 11, 171 (1992)
54. P. Geiger and E.S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6855 (1994).
55. R. Kokoski and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 35, 907 (1987).
56. M.E. Luke, Phys. Lett. 25B, 447 (1990).
57. J. Chay, H. Georgi, and B. Grinstein, Phys. Lett. B 247, 399 (1990).
58. I.I. Bigi, N.G. Uraltsev, and A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Lett. B 293, 430 (1992)
59. Phys. Lett. BI.I. BigiN.G. UraltsevA.I. Vainshtein297, 477(E) (1993)
60. I.I. Bigi, M.A. Shifman, N.G. Uraltsev, and A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 496 (1993)
61. I.I. BigiM.A. ShifmanN.G. UraltsevA.I. VainshteinInt. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 2467 (1994)
62. B. Blok, L. Koyrakh, M.A. Shifman, and A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3356 (1994)
63. Phys. Rev. DB. BlokL. KoyrakhM.A. ShifmanA.I. Vainshtein50, 3572(E) (1994)
64. I.I. Bigi and N.G. Uraltsev, Z. Phys. C 62, 623 (1994)
65. M.A. Shifman, N.G. Uraltsev, and A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2217 (1995)
66. Phys. Rev. DM.A. ShifmanN.G. UraltsevA.I. Vainshtein51, 3149(E) (1995)
67. B. Chibisov, R.D. Dikeman, M.A. Shifman, and N.G. Uraltsev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 2075 (1997)
68. R.D. Dikeman and N.G. Uraltsev, Nucl. Phys. B509, 378 (1998).
69. N. Isgur, Phys. Lett. B 448, 111 (1999).
70. In the full flux tube model (in contradistinction to the quark potential model derived from it in the adiabatic approximation) the motion of the flux tube center-of-mass can make both longitudinal and transverse contributions to a hadron's charge radius. See N. Isgur, “Flux Tube Zero-Point Motion, Hadronic Charge Radii, and Hybrid Meson Production Cross Sections,” JLAB-THY-99-09, hep-ph/9904494, 1999 [Phys. Rev. D (to be published)].