Contraceptive equity and access in the United States: A 2005 update

Contraception

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 317-318

  Kaunitz, Andrew M ^a   Shields, Wayne C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b Association of Reproductive Health Professionals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ABORTION; CONTRACEPTION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LAW; PREGNANCY; PRESCRIPTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEXUALITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 18044367955     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.02.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nsfg/nsfgcycle6.htm [accessed 1-16-05]
2. The Alan Guttmacher Institute Uneven and unequal: insurance coverage and reproductive health services 1994 Alan Guttmacher Institute New York
3. http://www.kaiserfamilyfoundation.org/womenshealth/1404-index.cfm [accessed 01-04-05]
4. A.M. Kaunitz Fair access to contraception-legislation worth supporting [Editorial] Female Patient 27 March 2002 10 11
5. A. Petersen, and J. Spencer The latest birth-control battle. Having won coverage for the pill, employees now press for insurance to pay for newer alternatives Wall Street J October 26 2004 D1
6. Rodriguez P. Insurance coverage and reproductive health options (ARHP Contraceptive Corner). Female Patient 2004;29:44-6, 59.
7. F.A. Sonnenberg, B.T. Burkman, C.G. Hagerty, L. Speroff, and T. Speroff Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods Contraception 69 2004 447 459
8. C. Chiun-Fang, J. Trussell, and E. Reyes Economic analysis of contraceptives for women Contraception 68 2003 3 10