Role of strong correlation in the recent angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy experiments on cuprate superconductors

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2005, Pages

  Yunoki, S ^a   Dagotto, E ^b,c   Sorella, S ^a  

^a SISSA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^c OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGLE-RESOLVED PHOTOEMISSION SPECTROSCOPY (ARPES); BRILLOUIN ZONES; FERMI VELOCITY; LINEAR MOMENTUM;

EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; HAMILTONIANS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PHOTOEMISSION;

OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS;

EID: 18044362312     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.037001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J. G. Bednorz et al., Z. Phys. B 64, 189 (1986).
2. See, e.g., E. Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).
3. See, e.g., A. Damascelli, Z.-X. Shen, and Z. Hussain, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003).
4. P. V. Bogdanov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2581 (2000).
5. A. Lanzara et al., Nature (London) 412, 510 (2001); P. D. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 177007 (2001).
6. A. Lanzara et al., Nature (London) 412, 510 (2001); P. D. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 177007 (2001).
7. X. J. Zhou et al., Nature (London) 423, 398 (2003).
8. See, e.g., M. Eschrig et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 144503 (2003); S. Verga et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 054503 (2003).
9. See, e.g., M. Eschrig et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 144503 (2003); S. Verga et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 054503 (2003).
10. F. C. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988).
11. E. Dagotto and J. Riera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 682 (1993).
12. S. Sorella et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002).
13. C. Gros, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 189, 53 (1989); H. Yokoyama and M. Ogata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3615 (1996), and references.
14. C. Gros, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 189, 53 (1989); H. Yokoyama and M. Ogata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3615 (1996), and references.
15. k, a particle-hole transformation for electrons with down spin is used [H. Yokoyama and H. Shiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 2482 (1988)].
16. (N).
17. S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 64, 024512 (2001).
18. See, e.g., J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1988).
19. Y. Ohta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 324 (1994).
20. R. B. Laughlin, cond-mat/0209269.
21. var.
22. Since we did not find a significant size dependence of the optimized variational parameters, the optimized parameters for L = 242 are used for L = 1250.
23. A. Paramekanti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217002 (2001); Phys. Rev. B 70, 054504 (2004).
24. A. Paramekanti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217002 (2001); Phys. Rev. B 70, 054504 (2004).
25. M. Randeria et al., Phys. Rev. B 69, 144509 (2004).
26. J. The model they studied is the Hubbard model, not the t-J model.
27. K. Tanaka et al., cond-mat/0312575.
28. See, e.g., G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2000).
29. See also A. A. Kordyuk et al., cond-mat/0405696.
30. By computing the quasiparticle weight, we have checked that this widely used assumption holds for x ≳ 0.1.
31. For another point of view on the explanation of the kink, see Ref. [21].
32. See, e.g., G.-H. Gweon et al., Nature (London) 430, 187 (2004).