The Disjunction Effect: Does It Exist for Two-Step Gambles?

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 250-264

  Kühberger, Anton ^a   Komunska, Dagmara ^a   Perner, Josef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17944402779     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2942     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allison G. T. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile crisis. 1971;Little, Brown, Boston.
2. Berman L. Planning a tragedy. 1982;Norton, New York.
3. Byrnes J. P., Miller D. C., Schafer W. D. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 125:1999;367-383.
4. Croson R. T. A. The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 80:1999;118-133.
5. Hsee C., Weber E. A fundamental prediction error: Self-other discrepancies in risk preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 126:1997;45-53.
6. Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition. 11:1982;123-141.
7. Kühberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 75:1998;23-55.
8. Kühberger A., Huber O. Decision making with missing information: A verbal protocol study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 10:1998;269-290.
9. Kühberger A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Perner J. The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 78:1999;204-231.
10. Paese P., Sniezek J. Influences on the appropriateness of confidence in judgment: Practice, effort, information, and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 48:1991;100-130.
11. Pany K., Reckers P. M. J. With- vs. Between-subjects experimental designs: A study of demand effects. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 7:1987;39-53.
12. Poulton E. C. Range effects in experiments on people. American Journal of Psychology. 88:1975;3-32.
13. Savage L. J. The foundations of statistics. 1954;Wiley, New York.
14. Shadish W. R., Haddock C. K. Combining estimates of effect size. Cooper H., Hedges L. V. The handbook of research synthesis. 1994;261-281 Sage, New York.
15. Shafir E. Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition. 50:1994;403-430.
16. Shafir E., Simonson I., Tversky A. Reason based choice. Cognition. 49:1993;11-36.
17. Shafir E., Tversky A. Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;449-474.
18. Simonson I. Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research. 16:1989;158-174.
19. Telhami S. Power and leadership in international bargaining: The path to the Camp David accords. 1990;Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
20. Tversky A., Bar-Hillel M. Risk: The long and the short. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 9:1983;713-717.
21. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business. 59:1986;251-278.
22. Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psychological Review. 95:1988;251-278.
23. Tverky A., Shafir E. The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science. 3:1992;305-309.
24. Wang X. T. Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition. 60:1996;31-63.