Aquatic toxicity of selected chemicals as a basic criterion for environmental classification

Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Toksikologiju

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 207-213

  Tišler, Tatjana ^a   Zagorc Končan, Jana ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

1,4 Butynediol; Aquatic environment; Arsenic; Copper; Labelling of dangerous substances; Phenol; Ready biodegradability

Indexed keywords

1,4 BUTYNEDIOL; ARSENIC; COPPER; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PHENOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ALGA; BIOACCUMULATION; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHRONIC TOXICITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAPHNIA; FISH; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; ARSENIC; BUTYLENE GLYCOLS; COPPER; DAPHNIA; PHENOL; SCENEDESMUS; TOXICITY TESTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

ALGAE; DAPHNIA;

EID: 17944391704     PISSN: 00041254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Pederson F, Tyle H, Niemela JR, Guttmann B, Lander L, Wedebrand A. Environmental hazard classification, data collection and interpretation guide for substances to be evaluated for classification as dangerous for the environment. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord; 1994;(589).
2. Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. OJ 1967;(196): 1-98.
3. Council Directive 79/831/EEC of 18 September 1979 amending for the sixth time directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. OJ 1979;(259):1-28.
4. Council Directive 92/32/EEC of 30 April 1992 amending for the seventh time directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances Directive. OJ 1992;(154):1-29.
5. N-class database on environmental hazard classification. Nordic Council of Ministers, European Chemicals Bureau; 2002. Available from: URL:http://www.kemi.se/nclass/default.asp
6. th edition. Washington (DC): APHA, AWWA, WEF; 1998.
7. Thompson AS, Rhodes JC, Pettman I, editors. Culture collection of algae and protozoa, catalogue of strains. Cumbria: CCAP Freshwater Biological Association, Natural Environment Research Council; 1988. p. 22.
8. Annex V to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. OJ 1992;(L 383A): 163-86.
9. Bringmann G, Kühn R. Comparison of the toxicity thresholds of water pollutants to bacteria, algae and protozoa in the cell multiplication inhibition test. Water Res 1980;14:231-41.
10. Arndt R. Biologische Wasseruntersuchung, Chlorophyll [Biological investigation. Chlorophyll]. In: Breitig G, von Tümpling W, editors. Ausgewählte Methoden der Wasseruntersuchung. Biologische, mikrobiologische und toxikologische methoden [Selected methods of water investigation. Biological, microbiological and toxicological methods]. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1982. p. 287-92.
11. Kühn R, Pattard M, Pernack KD, Winter A. Results of the harmful effects of water pollutants to Daphnia magna in the 21 d reproduction test. Water Res 1984;23:501-10
12. US Environmental Protection Agency. USEPA toxicity data analysis software. Cincinnati (OH); Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory: 1994.
13. Tišler T, Zagorc-Končan J. A simple flow-through system for toxicity testing with daphnids. Water Air Soil Pollut 1999;111:327-36.
14. OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals. Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD Guideline 211. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 1998.
15. th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. OJ 2001;(225):1-333.
16. nd edition. London: Taylor and Francis; 1995. p. 775-802.
17. Moore JM, Ramamoorthy S. Heavy metals in natural waters. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 1984. p. 5-27.
18. Mance G. Pollution threat of heavy metals in aquatic environments. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1987. p. 127-32.
19. Bartell SM, Gardner GH, O'Neill RV. Ecological risk estimation: Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; 1992. p. 17-42.
20. Blanck H, Holmgren K, Landner L, Norin H, Notini M, Rosemarin A, et al. Advanced hazard assessment of arsenic in the Swedish environment. In: Landner L, editor. Chemicals in the aquatic environment: advanced hazard assessment. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1989. p. 256-328.
21. Tišler T, Zagorc-Končan J. Acute and chronic toxicity of arsenic to some aquatic organisms. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2002;69:421-9.
22. Richardson ML, Gangolli S. editors. The dictionary of substances and their effects. Volumes 1 and 6. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1992 and 1994.
23. Žgajnar Gotvajn A, Zagorc-Končan J. Whole effluent and single substances approach: a tool for hazardous wastewater management. Water Sci Technol 1998;37: 219-27.
24. Žgajnar Gotvajn A, Zagorc-Končan J. Comparison of biodegradability assessment tests for chemical substances in water. Water Sci Technol 1996;33:201-12.