Axiomatic design as a background for concurrent engineering education and practice

Proceedings of the 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 419-427

  Goncalves Coelho A M ^a   Mourão, António J F ^a   Pamies Teixeira, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC DESIGN (AD); ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; RAPID PROTOTYPING;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING;

EID: 17944390820     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Altshuller, G.S. 1984. Creativity as an Exact Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Gordon & Breach Publishers.
2. Bakerjian, R. (ed.) 1992. Tool And Manufacturing Engineers Handbook, Vol. VI: Design For Manufacturability, Dear-born, Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
3. Callen, H.B. 1960 Thermodynamics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Clausing, D. 1994. Total Quality Development: A Step-by-Step Guide to World-Class Concurrent Engineering, New York: ASME Press.
5. Dong, Q. & Whitney, D.E. 2001. Designing a Requirement Driven Product Development Process, ASME 13th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, September 9-12 2001.
6. Frey, D.D. & Hirschi, N.W. 2002. The Effects of Coupling on Parameter Design, 2nd International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June10-11 2002.
7. Gonçalves-Coelho, A.M. 1994. O Projecto de Engenharia: Uma Perspectiva Axiomática (Engineering Design: An Axiomatic Point of View), Monte de Caparica, Portugal: FCT/UNL.
8. Gonçalves-Coelho, A.M. & Mourão, A.J.F. 2003. Improving QFD with Axiomatic Design, in preparation.
9. Harutunian, V., Nordlund, M., Tate, D. & Suh, N.P. 1996. Decision Making and Software Tools for Product Development Based on Axiomatic Design Theory, The CIRP General Assembly, Como, Italy, August 2 5-31 1996.
10. Hauser, J.R. & Clausing, D. 1988. The House of Quality, Harvard Business Review, 66(3): 63-73.
11. Hintersteiner, J.D. 1999. A Fractal Representation for Systems, The 1999 International CIRP Seminar, Enschede, Netherlands, March 24-26 1999.
12. Lindholm, D., Tate, D. & Harutunian, H. 1999. Consequences of Design Decisions in Axiomatic Design, Transactions of the Society for Design and Process Science, 3(4): 1-12.
13. Nordlund, M., Tate,. D. & Suh, N.P. 1996. Growth of Axiomatic Design through Industrial Practice, 3rd CIRP Workshop on Design and the Implementation of Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Tokyo, Japan, June 19-21 1996: 77-84.
14. Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. 1999. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (2nd Ed.), London: Springer-Verlag.
15. Saleh, J.H., Hastings, D.E. & Newman, D.J. 2001. Extracting the Essence of Flexibility in System Design, 3rd NASA/DoD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware, Long Beach, California, 12-14 July 2001.
16. Shannon, C.E. 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423.
17. Suh, N.P. 1990. The Principles of Design, New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Suh, N.P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Suh, N.P. 2002. Implications of the Design Axioms in System Design, 2nd International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 10-11 June 2002.
20. Tate, D. 1999. A Roadmap for Decomposition: Activities, Theories and Tools for System Design, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT, PhD Thesis.