An evaluation of the San Francisco Department of Human Services Welfare Dental Program

Journal of Public Health Dentistry

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 104-109

  Hyde, Susan ^a   Weintraub, Jane A ^a   Satariano, William A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental care; Dentistry; Program evaluation; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SATISFACTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WELFARE;

EID: 17844400920     PISSN: 00224006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2005.tb02794.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Comparison of Prior Law and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193), 1996. Available from: URL: http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/hsp/isp/ reform.htm
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. Major provisions of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193), 1997. Available from: URL: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/welfare/ aspesum.htm
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families policy announcement. Washington, DC, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family Assistance, 1997. Available from: URL: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/ofa/guidej31.htm
4. Oosterhaven SP, Westert GP, Schaub RM. Perception and significance of dental appearance: the case of missing teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:123-6.
5. Eli I, Bar-Tal Y, Kostovetzki I. At first glance: social meanings of dental appearance. J Public Health Dent 2001;61(3):150-4.
6. Gift HC, Reisine ST, Larach DC. The social impact of dental problems and visits. Am J Public Health 1992;82(12):1663-8.
7. Hollister MC and Weintraub JA. The association of oral status with systemic health, quality of life, and economic productivity. J Dent Educ 1993;57(12):901-12.
8. US Department of Health and Human Services. Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: NIDCR/NIH, 2000.
9. Hyde S. The impact of an oral health intervention on the quality of life among San Francisco welfare reform participants [dissertation]. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2003.
10. Hyde S and Weintraub JA. Oral health and oral health-related quality of life of San Francisco welfare reform participants. J Public Health Dent 2003;63(Suppl 1):S45.
11. nd International Association for Dental Research; Honolulu, HI; 2004 Mar 10-13. Available from: URL: http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2004Hawaii/techprogram/.
12. th. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2001.
13. Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? J Am Med Assoc 1988;260:1743-48.
14. Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Data Resource Center. Oral Health US, 2002. Bethesda, MD, 2002.
15. nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
16. Al-Tayyib AA, Rogers SM, Gribble JN, Villarroel M, Turner CF. Effect of low medical literacy on health survey measurements. Am J Public Health 2002;92(9):1478-81.
17. US Department of Health and Human Services. National call to action to promote oral health. Rockville, MD: NIDCR/NIH, 2003. NIH Publication No. 03-5303.