Semiempirical MO approach to the mechanism of the NIS-mediated nucleophilic addition to glycals: Multicomponent intermediates as models to tackle reactivity in organic chemistry

Tetrahedron Asymmetry

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1615-1629

  Mota, Antonio J ^a,c   Castellanos, Elena ^b   Álvarez De Cienfuegos, Luis ^a,d   Robles, Rafael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b Instituto de Quimica de la UNAM   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; IODINE DERIVATIVE; NUCLEIC ACID BASE; NUCLEOSIDE DERIVATIVE; SUCCINIMIDE DERIVATIVE;

ADDITION REACTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ENERGY; GLYCOSIDATION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NUCLEOSIDATION; ORGANIC CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILYLATION; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 17844396203     PISSN: 09574166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2005.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. D.S. Middleton, and N.S. Simpkins Synth. Commun. 19 1989 21 29
2. M.-J. Lynch, J. Simpson, and R.T. Weavers Aust. J. Chem. 46 1993 203 212
3. M. Smietana, V. Gouverneur, and C. Mioskowski Tetrahedron Lett. 41 2000 193 195
4. C.U. Kim, B.Y. Luh, and J.C. Martin J. Org. Chem. 56 1991 2642 2647
5. S.J. Danishefsky, and M.T. Bilodeau Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 35 1996 1380 1419 and references cited therein
6. D.R. Mootoo, P. Konradsson, U. Udodong, and B. Fraser-Reid J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 1988 5583 5584
7. R.W. Friesen, and S.J. Danishefsky J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111 1989 6656 6660
8. R.W. Friesen, and S.J. Danishefsky Tetrahedron 46 1990 103 112
9. J. Thiem, H. Karl, and J. Schwentner Synthesis 1978 696 698
10. J. Thiem, and H. Karl Tetrahedron Lett. 19 1978 4999 5002
11. J. Thiem, and P. Ossowowski J. Carbohydr. Chem. 3 1984 287 313
12. J. Thiem, A. Prahst, and T. Wendt Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1986 1044 1056
13. J. Thiem, and W. Klaffke J. Org. Chem. 54 1989 2006 2009
14. V. Costantino, C. Imperatore, E. Fattorusso, and A. Mangoni Tetrahedron Lett. 41 2000 9177 9180
15. A. Speicher, and T. Eicher J. Prakt. Chem. 340 1998 278 280
16. C.U. Kim, and P.F. Misco Tetrahedron Lett. 33 1992 5733 5736
17. R. Robles, C. Rodríguez, I. Izquierdo, M.-T. Plaza, and A. Mota Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 8 1997 2959 2965
18. R. Robles, I. Izquierdo, C. Rodríguez, M.-T. Plaza, A.J. Mota, and L. Álvarez de Cienfuegos Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 2002 399 405
19. L. Álvarez de Cienfuegos, C. Rodríguez, A.J. Mota, and R. Robles Org. Lett. 5 2003 2743 2745
20. R. Robles, C. Rodríguez, L. Álvarez de Cienfuegos, and A.J. Mota Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 2004 831 838
21. J.B. Foresman, and Æ. Frisch Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods 2nd ed. 1996 Gaussian Pittsburgh, PA, USA
22. F. Jensen Introduction to computational chemistry 1999 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Chichester, England
23. Some examples: J.W. McIver Jr., and A. Komornicki J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 1972 2625 2633
24. C.S. Wu, W.C. Neely, and S.D. Worley J. Comput. Chem. 12 1991 862 867
25. Y.L. Dory, P. Soucy, M. Drouin, and P. Deslongchamps J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 1995 518 529
26. W.M.F. Fabian, and G. Kollenz J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995 515 518
27. A.B.J. Parusel, R. Schamschule, D. Piorun, K. Rechthaler, A. Puchala, D. Rasala, K. Rotkiewicz, and G. Köhler J. Mol. Struct. 419 1997 63 75
28. Z. Markovic, S. Konstantinovic, I. Juranic, and L. Dosen-Micovic Gazz. Chim. Ital. 127 1997 429 434
29. L. Lorenc, V. Pavlovich, I. Juranich, M.L. Mihailovich, L. Bondarenko-Gheorghiu, N. Krstich, and M. Dabovich Molecules 4 1999 272 278
30. M. Grotjahn, N. Jäger, H.-J. Drexler, H.-J. Holdt, and E. Kleinpeter J. Mol. Model. 5 1999 72 77
31. S. Bohm, R. Pohl, and J. Kuthan Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 64 1999 1761 1769
32. P. Merino, and J.A. Mates Arkivoc xi 2001 12 30
33. A.J. Mota, R. Robles, L. Álvarez de Cienfuegos, and A. Lamenca Tetrahedron Lett. 45 2004 3349 3353
34. L. Álvarez de Cienfuegos, A.J. Mota, C. Rodríguez, and R. Robles Tetrahedron Lett. 46 2005 469 473
35. C.H. Hamann, R. Koch, and S. Pleus J. Carbohydr. Chem. 21 2002 53 63
36. L. Santana, M. Teijeira, E. Uriarte, J. Balzarini, and E. De Clercq Eur. J. Med. Chem. 37 2002 755 760
37. T. Lai, and R.E. Marsh Acta Crystallogr. 1328 1973 1982 1989
38. R. Stolarski, A. Pohorille, L. Dudycz, and D. Shugar Biochim. Biophys. Acta 610 1980 1 9
39. M. Orozco, C. Luis, J. Mallol, E.I. Canela, and R. Franco J. Pharm. Sci. 79 1990 133 137
40. M.T. Baumgartner, M.I. Motura, R.H. Contreras, A.B. Pierini, and M.C. Briñón Nucleos. Nucleot. Nucleic Acids 22 2003 45 62
41. Hyperchem™, Hypercube, Inc., 1115 NW 4th Street, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA
42. C.E. Sowa, J. Kopf, and J. Thiem J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995 211 212
43. M.J.S. Dewar G. Cumberlege Electronic Theory of Organic Chemistry 1949 Oxford University Press London Chapter VIII
44. K. Morokuma Acc. Chem. Res. 10 1977 295 300
45. T.A. Albright, J.K. Burdett, and M.H. Whangbo Orbital Interactions in Chemistry 1985 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Baffins Lane, Chichester Chapter 3
46. A.D. Becke Phys. Rev. A 38 1988 3098 3100
47. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R.G. Parr Phys. Rev. B 37 1988 785 789
48. A.D. Becke J. Chem. Phys. 98 1993 5648 5652
49. S.L. Price S. Scheiner Molecular Interactions 1997 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Baffins Lane, Chichester Chapter 9
50. Slight differences can be found because in the bicomponent model, the starting product was the bicomponent intermediate, and the different intermediates were calculated on approaching the base moiety (Table 5). For the tricomponent model, a complete 'unconstrained' search for the transition state was found
51. Nucl distance (Å) is 1.547 (PM3), 1.500 (AM1), and 1.509 (DFT). In the same manner, in the tricomponent transition state 10, this distance becomes 2.011 (PM3), 1.905 (AM1), and 1.909 (DFT)
52. D.M. Ferguson, I.R. Gould, W.A. Glauser, S. Schroeder, and P.A. Kollman J. Comput. Chem. 13 1992 525 532
53. M. Giordan, and R. Custodio J. Comput. Chem. 17 1996 156 166
54. Due to the different treatments that AM1 and PM3 semiempirical methods grant to the phenyl groups' interactions, differences in the optimal three-dimensional arrangement for these groups are usually found
55. J. Burdett Steric Repulsion in Chemical bonds: a Dialog 1997 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Baffins Lane, Chichester
56. M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, J.A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C. Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J.E. Knox, H.P. Hratchian, J.B. Cross, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, P.Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, V.G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A.D. Daniels, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A.G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, and J.A. Pople Gaussian 03, Revision B.02 2003 Gaussian Pittsburg, PA
57. Energies and Cartesian coordinates are available, on request, from the corresponding author