Unilateral mandibular ramus elongation by intraoral distraction osteogenesis

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 247-254

  Kofod, Thomas ^a,b   Nørholt, Sven Erik ^a   Pedersen, Thomas Klit ^a,b   Jensen, John ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Cephalometry; Distraction osteogenesis; Mandible; Mandibular hypoplasia; Vector control

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE HYPOPLASIA; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MANDIBULAR NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VECTOR CONTROL; BONE SCREW; CHILD; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FOLLOW UP; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; ROTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; MANDIBLE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; ROTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 17844395236     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200503000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Glowacki J, Shusterman E, Troulis M, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;133:566-573
2. Ilizarov G. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989;238:249-281
3. Ilizarov G. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue. Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989;239:263-285
4. Karaharju-Suvanto T, Peltonen J, Kahri A, Karaharju EO. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. An experimental study on sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:118-121
5. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89: 1-8
6. Wangarin K, Group H. Die enorale distractionsosteotomie des mikrogen unterkiefers zur beseitigung der atemwegsobstuction. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 1994;18;236
7. Molina F, Monasterio FO. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:825-840
8. Diner PA, Tomat C, Soupre V, et al. Intraoral mandibular distraction: indications, technique and long-term results. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999;28:634-641
9. Wangarin K, Groop H. Der enorale zugang bei Ilizarov-kallus-distraction am unterkiefer. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 1995;19:303-307
10. Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Contasti GI, Rodriguez AM. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;35:383-392
11. Wangarin K. Distraction in der Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichts-chrirurgie. Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 2000;4(Suppl 1):226-236
12. McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Mehrara BJ, Longaker MT. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1812-1827
13. Hanson PR, Melugin MB. Orthodontic management of the patient undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Semin Orthod 1999;5:25-34
14. Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Eleftherioud S, et al. Extraoral versus intraoral distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:386-394
15. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R, et al. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:89-103
16. Swennen G, Dempf R, Schliephake H. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:123-135
17. Grayson B, Santiago P. Treatment planning and biomechanics of distraction osteogenesis from an orthodontic prospective. Semin Orthod 1999;5:9-24
18. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. New York: Medical Sciences, 1940
19. Hendricks K, Mommaerts MY, Jacobs W, et al. Proximal segment position after distraction with the MD-DOS device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999;27:383-386
20. Hurmerinta K, Hukki J. Vector control in lower jaw distraction osteogenesis using an extra-oral multidirectional device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:263-270
21. Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Contasti GI, et al. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Semin Orthod 1999;5:35-40
22. Block MS, Daire J, Stover J, et al. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following mandibular lengthening in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51: 652-660
23. Hu J, Tang Z, Wang D, et al. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1041-1045
24. Wang XX, Wang X, Li ZL. Effects of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the inferior alveolar nerve: an experimental study in monkeys. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2773-2779
25. Whitesides LM, Meyer RA. Effect of distraction osteogenesis on the severely hypoplastic mandible and inferior alveolar nerve function. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:292-297
26. Mommaerts MY, Jacobs W, de Jonghe N. Mandibular distraction using a dynamic osteosynthesis system: MS-DOS. Concepts and surgical technique. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Surg 1998;99:223-230
27. Margulis A, Patel PK, Daw JL, Bauer BS. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible with an internal bioresorbable device. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:791-796
28. Breuning KH, van Strijen PJ, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. The overbite and intraoral distraction osteogenesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:119-125