Leadership as the orchestration and improvisation of dialogue: Cognitive and communicative skills in conversations among leaders and subordinates

Leader Development for Transforming Organizations: Growing Leaders for Tomorrow

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 177-208

  Cohen, Marvin S ^a  

^a Cognitive Technologies Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17844392130     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610102     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Austin, J. (1965). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Barge, J. K. (1994). Leadership: Communication skills for organizations and groups. New York:St. Martin's.
3. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stodgill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.
4. Blumer, R. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. In L. Nichol (Ed.), On dialogue (pp. 6-47). London: Routledge.
6. Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
8. Cohen, M. S., Adelman, L., Bresnick, T., Marvin, F., Salas, E., & Riedel, S. (2003). Using dialogue methods to teach critical thinking in Army battlefield tactics. Manuscript in preparation.
9. Cohen, M., Freeman, J. T., & Thompson, B. B. (1998). Critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: A model and a training method. In J. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Decision-making under stress: Implications for training and simulation (pp. 155-189). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Cohen, M. S., Salas, E., & Riedel, S. (2002). Critical thinking: Challenges, possibilities, and purpose. Arlington, VA: Cognitive Technologies.
11. Cohen, M. S., & Thompson, B. B. (2001). Training teams to take initiative: Critical thinking in novel situations. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in cognitive engineering and human performance research (pp. 251-291). Amsterdam: JAI.
12. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Geis, M. (1995). Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1990). Plans for discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. F. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in Communication (pp. 417-444). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Hamblin, C. H. (1970). Fallacies. Newport News, VA: Vale.
17. Hutchins, E. (1990). The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 191-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York: Currency.
20. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Kasermann, M. (1991). Obstruction and dominance: Uncooperative moves and their effect on the course of conversation. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 101-123). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble.
22. Keppler, A., & Luckmann, T. (1991). 'Teaching': Conversational transmission of knowledge. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 143-165). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble.
23. Knoblauch, H. (1991). The taming of foes: The avoidance of symmetry in informal discussions. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 166-194). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble.
24. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Linell, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 1-20). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble.
26. Mason, R. (1983). Chickenhawk. New York: Penguin.
27. Northouse, P. G. (2001). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). A theory of explanation-based decision making. In G. Klein, J. Orasanu, & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 188-201). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64-91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Rescher, N. (1977). Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. Albany:State University of New York Press.
31. Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1999). Everyday cognition: Development in social context. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
32. Rommetveit, R. (1991). Dominance and asymmetries in A Doll's House. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 195-220). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble.
33. Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34. Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
35. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Searle, J. R. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401-416). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Shay, J. (1995). Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character. New York: Simon & Schuster.
39. Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. A. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Turner, M. (2001). Cognitive dimensions of social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. van Dijk, T. A. (1997) Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
44. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1983). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.
45. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
46. Walton, D. N. (1995). A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
47. Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto.
48. Weick, K. (2001). Making sense of organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Whitten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1997). Machiavellian intelligence II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Yankelovich, D. (1999). The magic of dialogue: Transforming conflict into cooperation. New York:Simon & Schuster.
51. Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.