Qualitative teamwork issues and strategies: Coordination through mutual adjustment

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 394-410

  Hall, Wendy A ^a   Long, Bonita ^a   Bermbach, Nicole ^b   Jordan, Sharalyn ^a   Patterson, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Tradeworks Training Society   (Canada)

Author keywords

Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Teamwork strategies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; COORDINATION; CREATIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SENSIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TEAMWORK; CANADA; COOPERATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; URBAN POPULATION; VOLUNTARY WORKER;

CANADA; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; URBAN POPULATION; VOLUNTARY WORKERS;

EID: 17844387617     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732304272015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2. Andrews, M., Lyne, P., & Riley, E. (1996). Validity in qualitative health care research: An exploration of the impact of individual researcher perspectives within collaborative inquiry. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 441-447.
3. Baldwin, R. G., & Austin, A. E. (1995). Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 45-70.
4. Barry, C., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26-44.
5. Bozeman, D. P., Street, M. D., & Fiorito, J. (1999). Positive and negative coauthor behaviors in the process of research collaboration. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(2), 159-177.
6. Delaney, W., & Ames, G. (1993). Integration and exchange in multidisciplinary alcohol research. Social Science & Medicine, 37(1), 5-13.
7. Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141-1147.
8. Ford, K., Oberski, I., & Higgins, S. (2000). Computer-aided qualitative analysis of interview data: Some recommendations for collaborative working. Qualitative Report, 4(3/4). Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/oberski.html
9. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco: University of California Press.
10. Glaser, B. (1992). Emergence versus forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
11. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
12. Glenwick, D., & Burka, A. A. (1978). Research collaboration between graduate students: Facilitating the rites of passage. Teaching of Psychology, 5(4), 213-214.
13. Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 257-272.
14. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
15. Liggett, A. M., Glesne, C. E., Johnston, A. P., Hasazi, S. B., & Schattman, R. A. (1994). Teaming in qualitative research: Lessons learned. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(1), 77-88.
16. Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment. New York: Free Press.
17. Martinez-Salgado, C. (1999). Unexpected findings of a female teamin Xochimilco, Mexico. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 11-25.
18. Muhr, T. (1993). ATLAS/ti: Computer aided text interpretation and theory building - User's manual. Berlin Germany: Author.
19. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). London: Sage.
20. Richards, L. (1999). Qualitative teamwork: Making it work. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 7-10.
21. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.
22. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory - Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Statistics Canada. (1995). Women in Canada (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Canada: Ministry of Supply and Services. (Catalogue No. 89-503E)
24. Tishelman, C., Forss, A., Sachs, L., Lundgren, E., Widmark, C., & Tornberg, S. (1999). Research on risk and risk in research: Theoretical and practical experiences from a multidisciplinary study on cervical cancer screening in urban Sweden. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 45-60.
25. Younglove-Webb, J., Gray, B., Abdalla, C. W., & Thurow, A. P. (1999). The dynamics of multidisciplinary research teams in academia. Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 425-440,