A patient, an internet article, and thou: Challenges of the internet in clinical practice

Journal of Medical Practice Management

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 180-182

  Falk, Robert ^a  

^a Powell Goldstein LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet; Medical malpractice; Online research; Patient; Physician; Web site

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL MEDICINE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION SERVICE; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CLINICAL MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; LIABILITY, LEGAL; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH;

EID: 17844386071     PISSN: 87550229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Tyler BJ. Cyberdoctors: The Virtual Housecall - The Actual Practice of Medicine is Here; Is it a Telemedical Accident Waiting to Happen? 1998; Ind. L. Rev. Vol. 31: 259.
2. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328A (1965).
3. Finder JM. The Future of Practice Guidelines: Should They Constitute Conclusive Evidence of the Standard of Care? Health Matrix 2000; Vol. 10: 67.
4. Shuman DW. The Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice Claims, Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Managed Care: Toward a Therapeutic Harmony? Cal. W. L. Rev. Fall 1997; Vol. 34: 99-100.
5. Id.