The effects of database parameter uncertainty on uranium(VI) equilibrium calculations

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Volumn 69, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 2183-2191

  Denison, Frank H ^a   Garnier Laplace, Jacqueline ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE IRSN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; EQUILIBRIUM; GEOCHEMISTRY; NUMERICAL METHOD; PARAMETERIZATION; RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; URANIUM;

EID: 17844385863     PISSN: 00167037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. G.M.N. Baston M. Brownsword J.E. Cross J. Hobley A.D. Moreton J.K. Smith-Briggs and H.P. Thomason The Solubility of Uranium in Cementitious Near-Field Chemical Conditions 1993 United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Oxford
2. G.E.P. Box and M.E. Muller A note on the generation of random normal deviates Ann. Math. Stat. 29 1958 610-611
3. V. Brendler G. Geipel G. Bernhard H. Nitsche Complexation in the system UO2[2+B]/PO4[3-]/OH[-] Potentiometric and spectroscopic investigations at very low ionic strengths Radiochim. Acta 74 1996 75-80
4. S.E. Cabaniss Propagation of uncertainty in aqueous equilibrium calculations Non-gaussian output distribution Anal. Chem. 69 1997 3658-3664
5. S.E. Cabaniss Uncertainty propagation in geochemical calculations Non-linearity in solubility equilibria Appl. Geochem. 14 1999 255-262
6. G.R. Choppin and J.N. Mathur Hydrolysis of actinyl(VI) cations Radiochim. Acta 52/53 1991 25-28
7. L.J. Criscenti G.F. Laniak and R.L. Erikson Propagation of uncertainty through geochemical code calculations Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60 19 1996 3551-3568
8. C. De Stefano A. Gianguzza T. Leggio S. Sammartano Dependence on ionic strength of the hydrolysis constants for dioxouranium(VI) in NaCl(aq) and NaNO3(aq), at pH < 6 and t = 25°C J. Chem. Eng. Data 47 2002 533-538
9. B. Efron and R.J. Tibshirani An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability Vol. 57 1993 Chapman & Hall London, UK
10. C. Ekberg Sensitivity analysis and simulation uncertainties in predictive geochemical modelling. Freiberg On-Line Geoscience 1999 Available at: http://www.geo.tu-freiberg.de/fog.
11. M. Galassi GNU Scientific Library 2002 Free Software Foundation Cambridge, MA
12. I. Grenthe J. Fuger R.J.M. Konings R.J. Lemire A.B. Muller C. Nguyen-Trung and H. Wanner Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium 1992 North-Holland, Amsterdam Netherlands
13. I. Grenthe I. Puigdomenech M.C.A. Sandino and M.H. Rand Corrections to the uranium NEA-TDB review IN: R.J. Silva (Eds.) Chemical Thermodynamics of Americium 1995 North-Holland, Amsterdam Netherlands 347-374
14. D.E. Knuth Seminumerical Algorithms 2nd ed. The Art of Computer Programming Vol. 2 1981 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
15. P. L'Ecuyer and C. Lemieux Recent advances in randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods In: M. Dror P. L'Ecuyer F. Szidarovszki (Eds.) Modelling Uncertainty An Examination of Its Theory, Methods, and Applications 2002 Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam Netherlands 419-474
16. R.J. Lemire and P.R. Tremaine Uranium and plutonium equilibria in aqueous solutions to 200°C J. Chem. Eng. Data 25 1980 361-370
17. J.N. Mathur Complexation and thermodynamics of the uranyl ion with phosphate Polyhedron 10 1991 47
18. M. Matsumoto and T. Nishimura Mersenne Twister. A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 1998
19. M.D. McKay W.J. Conover and R.J. Beckman A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code Technometrics 21 1979 239-245
20. G. Meinrath Direct spectroscopic speciation of schoepite phase equilibria J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 232 1998 179-188
21. B. Moro The full Monte In: R. Jarrow (Eds.) Over the Rainbow Developments in Exotic Options and Complex Swaps 1995 RISK Publications
22. O. Nitzsche G. Meinrath and B. Merkel Database uncertainty as a limiting factor in reactive transport prognosis J. Contam. Hydrol. 44 2000 223-237
23. OECD-NEA Survey of Thermodynamic and Kinetic Databases 1996 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Authority Paris
24. D.A. Palmer and C. Nguyen-Trung Aqueous uranyl complexes. 3. Potentiometric measurements of the hydrolysis of uranyl(VI) ion at 25°C J. Solut. Chem. 24 1995 1281-1291
25. P. Paquin et al. The biotic ligand model A historical overview Compar. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 133 2002 3-35
26. 2O(s) and the formation of U(VI) phosphate complexes Their influence in uranium speciation in natural waters Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56 1992 4135
27. S.M. Serkiz et al. Correcting errors in the thermodynamic database for the equilibrium speciation model MINTEQA2 Wat. Res. 30 8 1996 1930-1933
28. R.J. Silva Mechanisms for the retardation of uranium(VI) migration Mat. Res. Cos. Symp. Proc. 257 1992 323
29. D.S. Smith N.W.H. Adams and J.R. Kramer Resolving uncertainty in chemical speciation determinations Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63 1999 3337-3347
30. I.M. Sobol The distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 7 1967 86-112
31. C.L. Tebes-Stevens F. Espinoza and A.J. Valocchi Evaluating the sensitivity of a subsurface multicomponent reactive transport model with respect to transport and reaction parameters J. Contam. Hydrol. 52 2001 3-27
32. E.R. Unsworth and P. Jones The effect of thermodynamic data on computer model predictions of uranium speciation in natural water systems J. Environ. Monit. 4 4 2002 528-532
33. J. Van der Lee Thermodynamic and Mathematical Concepts of Chess 1998 École des Mines de Paris Paris
34. J. Van der Lee L. De Windt Present state and future directions of modeling of geochemistry in hydrogeological systems J. Contam. Hydrol. 47 2001 265-282