Genomic contributions in livestock gene introgression programmes

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 291-313

  Wall, Eileen ^a,b   Visscher, Peter M ^a   Hospital, Frédéric ^c   Woolliams, John A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Backcross; Genetic lag; Genomic contributions; Introgression; Linkage drag

Indexed keywords

INTROGRESSION; LIVESTOCK; SELECTIVE BREEDING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENETICS; GENOMICS;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; GENOMICS;

EID: 17844383257     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2005003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brenneman R.A., Davis S.K., Sanders J.O., Burns B.M., Wheeler T.C., Turner J.W., Taylor J.F., The polled locus maps to BTA1 in a Bos indicus x Bos taurus cross, J. Hered. 87 (1996) 156-161.
2. Brinkman M.A., Frey K.J., Yield component analysis of oat isolines that produce different grain yields, Crop Sci. 17 (1977) 165-168.
3. Brown A.H.D., Lawrence G.J., Jenkin M., Douglass J., Gregory E., Linkage drag in backcross breeding in barley, J. Hered. 80 (1989) 234-239.
4. Cox D.R., Hinkley D.V., Appendix 2, Theoretical statistics, Chapman and Hall, London,1974.
5. Franklin I.R., Improving the efficiency of backcrossing programs using DNA markers, Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed. Genet. 13 (1999) 357-360.
6. Freking B.A., Murphy S.K., Wylie A.A., Rhodes S.J., Keele J.W., Leymaster K.A., Jirtle R.L., Smith T.P.L., Identification of the single base change causing the callipyge muscle hypertrophy phenotype, the only known example of polar overdominance in mammals, Genome Res. 12 (2002) 1496-1506.
7. Frisch M., Melchinger A.E., The length of intact donor chromosome segment around a target gene in marker-assisted backcrossing, Genetics 157 (2001) 1343-1356.
8. Gama L.T., Smith C., Gibson J.P., Transgene effects, introgression strategies and testing schemes in pigs, Anim. Prod. 54 (1992) 427-440.
9. Grobet L., Martin L.J.R., Poncelet D., Pirottin D., Brouwers B., Riquet J., Schoeberlin A., Dunner S., Ménissier F., Massabanda J., Fries R., Hanset R., Georges M., A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle, Nat. Genet. 17 (1997) 71-74.
10. Groen A.F., Smith C., A stochastic simulation study of the efficiency of marker-assisted introgression in livestock, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 112 (1995) 161-170.
11. Groen A.F., Timmermans M.M.J., The use of genetic markers to increase the efficiency of introgression - a simulation study, Proc. 19 Worlds Poultr. C. 1 (1992) 523-527.
12. Haldane J.B.S., The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors, J. Genet. 8 (1919) 299-309.
13. Hanset R., Dasnois C., Scalais S., Michaux C., Grobet L., Introgression into the pietrain genome of the normal allele at the locus for halothane sensitivity, Genet. Sel. Evol. 27 (1995) 77-88.
14. Hanson W.D., Early generation analysis of lengths of heterozygous chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrossing or selfing, Genetics 44 (1959) 833-837.
15. Hillel J., Schaap T., Haberfield A., Jeffreys A.J., Plotzky Y., Cahaner A., Lavi U., DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression in breeding programs, Genetics 124 (1990) 783-789.
16. Hospital F., Size of donor chromosome segments surrounding introgressions and the reduction of linkage drag in marker-assisted backcross programs, Genetics 158 (2001) 1363-1379.
17. Hospital F., Charcosset A., Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci, Genetics 147 (1997) 1469-1485.
18. Hospital F., Chevalet C., Mulsant P., Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs, Genetics 132 (1992) 1199-1210.
19. Looft C., Milan D., Jeon J.T., Paul S., Reinsch N., Rogel-Gaillard C., Rey V., Amarger V., Robic A., Kalm E., Chardon P., Andersson L., A high-density linkage map of the RN region in pigs, Genet. Sel. Evol. 32 (2000) 321-329.
20. Naveira H., Barbadilla A., The theoretical distribution of lengths of intact chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrossing in a diploid species, Genetics 130 (1992) 205-209.
21. Rothschild M., Jacobson C., Vaske D., Tuggle C., Wang L.Z., Short T., Eckardt G., Sasaki S., Vincent A., McLaren D., Southwood O., vanderSteen H., Mileham A., Plastow G., The estrogen receptor locus is associated with a major gene influencing litter size in pigs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 201-205.
22. Smith J., Bruley C.K., Paton I.R., Dunn I., Jones C.T., Windsor D., Morrice D.R., Law A.S., Masabanda J., Sazanov A., Waddington D., Fries R., Burt D.W., Differences in gene density on chicken macrochromosomes and microchromosomes, Anim. Genet. 31 (2000) 96-103.
23. Stam P., Zeven A.C., The theoretical proportion of the donor genome in near isogenic lines of self-fertilizers bred by backcrossing, Euphytica 30 (1981) 227-238.
24. Tanksley S.D., McCouch S.R., Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking the genetic potential from the wild, Science 277 (1997) 1063-1066.
25. Visscher P.M., Haley C.S., On the efficiency of marker-assisted introgression, Anim. Sci. 68 (1999) 59-68.
26. Visscher P.M., Haley C.S., Thompson R., Marker-assisted introgression in backcross breeding programs, Genetics 144 (1996) 1923-1932.
27. Wall E.E., Woolliams J.A., Visscher P.M., Genetic lag in a Meishan x Large White pig backcross population: A simulation study, Proc. BSAS (2002) 59.
28. Walling G.A., Dodds K.G., Galloway S.M., Beattie A.E., Lumsden J.M., Lord E.A., Montgomery G.W., McEwan J.C., The consequences of introducing the Booroola Fecundity (FecB) gene on liveweight, Proc. BSAS (2000) 43.
29. Zeven A.C., Knott D.R., Johnson R., Investigation of linkage drag in near isogenic lines of wheat be testing for seedling reaction to races of stem rust, leaf rust and yellow rust, Euphytica 32 (1983) 319-327.