The safety and efficacy of direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath instead of the skin for pneumoperitoneum

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 80-81

  Günenç, Mustafa Ziya ^a   Yesildaglar, Narter ^b,d   Bingöl, Banu ^c   Önalan, Goksen ^a   Tabak, Selcuk ^a   Gökmen, Bulent ^a  

^a Ankara Research and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

^b Zbeyde Hn Women's Hospital   (Turkey)

^c GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Direct trocar insertion; Laparoscopic access; Laparoscopic surgery; Pneumoperitoneum; Rectus sheath elevation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLIP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NEEDLE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; SAFETY; SKIN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TROCAR;

EID: 17844377322     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000162106.95875.b9     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Byron JW, Fujioshi CA, Miyazawa K. Evaluation of direct trocar insertion technique at laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:423-425.
2. Byron J, Markenson G. A randomized comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:259-262.
3. Jarret JC. Laparoscopy: direct trocar insertion without pneumoperitoneum. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:725-727.
4. Karatassas A, Walsh D, Hamilton DW. A safe, new approach to establishing a pneumoperitoneum at laparoscopy. Aust N Z Surg. 1992;62:489-491.
5. Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, et al. A comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:148-150.
6. Philips PA, Amaral JF. Abdominal complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:525-536.