Whole-body MR angiography using a novel 32-receiving-channel MR system with surface coil technology: First clinical experience

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 596-603

  Fenchel, Michael ^a   Requardt, Martin ^b   Tomaschko, Katrin ^a   Kramer, Ulrich ^a   Stauder, Norbert I ^a   Naegele, Thomas ^a   Schlemmer, Heinz Peter ^a   Claussen, Claus D ^a   Miller, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Magnetic resonance (MR); MR angiography; MR imaging; MR technology

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CLAUDICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCCLUSIVE CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WHOLE BODY MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; WHOLE BODY SCANNER;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 17844368652     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20303     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Heart Association. 2004 Heart and stroke statistical update. Dallas: American Heart Association 2003.
2. Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B, et al. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1117-1122.
3. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Chiras J, Dormont D, Marsault C. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003;229:697-702.
4. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220: 179-185.
5. De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, et al. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2000;214:373-380.
6. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, Williams DM, Wakefield T, Chenevert TL. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol 2001;36:283-291.
7. Kroencke TJ, Wasser MN, Pattynama PMT, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1573-1582.
8. Goyen M, Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Debatin JF, Bosk S, Ruehm SG. 0.5 M Gd chelate (Magnevist) versus 1.0 M Gd chelate (Gadovist): dose-independent effect on image quality of pelvic three-dimensional MR-angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:602-607.
9. Ho KYJAM, Leiner T, van Engelshoven JMA. MR angiography of run-off vessels. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1285-1289.
10. Ho KYJAM, Leiner T, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JMA. Peripheral MR angiography. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1765-1774.
11. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:163-169.
12. Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, et al. Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002;224:270-277.
13. Leiner T, de Vries M, Hoogeveen R, Vasbinder GBC, Lemaire E, van Engelshoven JMA. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial experience with a whole-body scanner in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:609-614.
14. Kruger DG, Riederer SJ, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ. Continuously moving table data acquisition method for long FOV contrast-enhanced MRA and whole-body MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:224-231.
15. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 2001; 357:1086-1091.
16. Nagele T, Klose U, Grodd W, Nusslin F, Voigt K. Nonlinear excitation profiles for three-dimensional inflow MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:416-420.
17. Danias PG, McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Chuang ML, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Prospective navigator correction of image position for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 1997;203:733-736.
18. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Lauenstein TC, et al. Optimization of contrast dosage for gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced high-resolution whole-body 3D magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:263-268.
19. Kim JK, Fab RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:283-289.
20. Heverhagen JT, Funck RC, Schwarz U, et al. Kinetic evaluation of an i.v. bolus of MR contrast media. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19: 1025-1030.
21. Goyen M, Herbom CU, Kröger K, Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Detection of atherosclerosis: systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography - initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:277-282.
22. Cosottini M, Calabrese R, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy? Eur Radiol 2003;13:571-581.
23. von Kemp K, van den Brande P, Peterson T, et al. Screening for concomitant diseases in peripheral vascular patients. Results of a systematic approach. Int Angiol 1997;16:114-122.
24. Dormandy J, Heeck L, Vig S. Lower-extremity arteriosclerosis as a reflection of a systemic process: implications for concomitant coronary and carotid disease. Semin Vasc Surg 1999;12:118-122.
25. Chiowanich P, Mitchell DG, Ortega HV, Mohamed F. Arterial pseudostenosis on first-pass gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: new observation of a potential pitfall. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:523-527.