An MRI-compatible semiautomated vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system: Initial feasibility study

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 637-644

  Daniel, Bruce L ^a   Freeman, Lynetta J ^b   Pyzoha, Jessica M ^b   McCoy, Terry D ^c   Birdwell, Robyn L ^a   Bouley, Donna M ^d   Movius, Brennan ^e   Hibner, John A ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ETHICON INC   (United States)

^c Stanford University ^*  (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Breast neoplasms; Core needle biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI compatible

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LACTATION; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY; SWINE; VACUUM;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SWINE; VACUUM;

EID: 17844365893     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20302     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3524-3531.
2. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30.
3. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1095-1102.
4. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000;215:267-79.
5. Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Obdeijn IM, Bartels KC, de Koning HJ, Oudkerk M. First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;63:53-60.
6. Daniel BL, Birdwell RL, Butts K, et al. Freehand iMRI-guided large-gauge core needle biopsy: a new minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of enhancing breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:896-902.
7. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR Imaging-gulded large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 2001; 220:31-39.
8. Schneider JP, Schulz T, Horn LC, Leinung S, Schmidt F, Kahn T. MR-guided percutaneous core biopsy of small breast lesions: first experience with a vertically open 0.5T scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:374-385.
9. LaNette FS, Henry-Tillman R, Mancino AT, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle biopsy and needle localized excision of occult breast lesions. Am J Surg 2001;182:414-418.
10. Cangiarella J, Gross J, Symmans WF, et al. The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification. J Surg Oncol 2000;74:263.
11. Scheler P, Pollow B, Hahn M, Kuner RP, Fischer A, Hoffmann G. Hand-held ultrasound-guided vacuum biopsy of mammary lesions-first experiences. Zentralbl Gynakol 2000;122:472-475.
12. Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ, et al. Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:405-408.
13. Heywant-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and inclslonal biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:1656-1665.
14. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat A, et al. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1463-1470.
15. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Amaya B, Alberich T, Lanaido M, Heywant- Köbrunner SH. MR-guided interventional breast procedures considering vacuum biopsy in particular. Eur J Radiol 2002;42:32-39.
16. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Thornton CM, Van Zee KJ, Tan LK. Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1283-1293.
17. McGahan JP, Griffey SM, Schneider PD, Brock JM, Jones CD, Zhan S. Radio-frequency electrocautery ablation of mammary tissue in swine. Radiology 2000;217:471-476.
18. Brenner RJ, Shellock FG, Rothman BJ, Giuliano A. Technical note: magnetic resonance imaging-guided pre-operative breast localization using "freehand technique". Br J Radiol 1995;68:1095-1098.
19. Daniel BL, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast lesion localization: a freehand. Interactive MR imaging-guided technique. Radiology 1998;207:455-63.
20. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H, Chough DM, Sumkin JH. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology 1995;197:739-42.
21. Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH. Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1249-54.