Output state in multiple entanglement swapping

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2003, Pages

  Sen, Aditi De ^a   Sen, Ujjwal ^a   Zukowski, Marek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOURIER TRANSFORMS; INTEGRATION; LASER PULSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIRRORS; MULTIPHOTON PROCESSES; OPTICAL BEAM SPLITTERS; PHASE SHIFTERS; PHOTONS; POLARIZATION;

FINITE DIMENSIONAL HILBERT SPACE; MULTIPLE ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING; PULSED PARAMETRIC DOWN CONVERSIONS; QUANTUM REPEATERS; QUBITS;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 17744406524     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, and A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993).
2. S. Bose, V. Vedral, and P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 57, 822 (1998)
3. S. Bose, V. Vedral, and P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 60, 194 (1999).
4. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
5. J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998).
6. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, and H. Weinfurter, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755, 91 (1995).
7. H.-J. Briegel, W. D̈ur, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998)
8. W. Dür, H.-J. Briegel, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 59, 169 (1999).
9. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
10. A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, H. Weinfurter, and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3031 (1997).
11. We shall not discuss here the effects linked with the statistics of the output of the PDC sources.
12. † is a creation operator of a photon with a frequency profile given by the function g(ω, t).
13. AB has nonpositive partial transpose otherwise. A state with nonpositive partial transpose is always entangled [12].
14. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
15. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
16. S. Hill and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997)
17. W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
18. G. Vidal, W. Dür, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 027901 (2002).
19. M. Horodecki, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062314 (2003).
20. P.W. Shor, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4334 (2002).
21. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 574 (1997).
22. E.M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 60, 179 (1999)
23. E.M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 63, 019902 (2001)
24. E.M. Rains, e-print quant-ph/0008047.
25. E.M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 60, 173 (1999).
26. J.S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
27. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995).
28. M. Zukowski and C. Brukner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 210401 (2002).
29. C.K. Hong and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2409 (1985).
30. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
31. The condition with the minus sign in the δ function cannot be met becausse in this case the phase-matching condition for the frequancies cannot be satisfied.
32. 0≈ω+ω′ for frequencies would have emerged (cf. Ref. [26]), and this is impossible to meet.