Responses of plankton and fish communities to mass removal of planktivorous fish in a two-basin lake in southern Finland

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 506-509, Issue , 2003, Pages 451-457

  Rask, Martti ^a   Olin, Mikko ^a   Keskitalo, Jorma ^b   Lehtovaara, Anja ^b   Ruuhijärvi, Jukka ^a   Vesala, Sami ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Blue green algae; Crustacean zooplankton; Eutrophication; Fish community; Lake restoration; Phytoplankton

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; BIOMASS; CATCHMENTS; FISHERIES; LAKES; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FISH COMMUNITIES; PLANKTONS;

MARINE BIOLOGY;

BIOMASS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CYANOBACTERIUM; EUTROPHICATION; ICHTHYOFAUNA; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; PLANKTON; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

ETELA-SUOMEN; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; LAKE AIMAJARVI; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

ALGAE; BOSMINA; CHLOROPHYTA; CLADOCERA; CRUSTACEA; CYANOBACTERIA; CYPRINIDAE; DAPHNIA; EUBOSMINA COREGONI; PISCES; UNCULTURED CYANOBACTERIUM;

EID: 17744405394     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008546.14629.11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Bagenal, T.B. & F.W. Tesch 1978. Age and growth. In Bagenal, T. (ed.), Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. Blackwell, Oxford: p. 101-136.
2. Horppila, J., H. Peltonen, T. Malinen, E. Luokkanen, & T. Kairesalo, 1998. Top-down or bottom-up effects by fish: issues of concern in biomanipulation of lakes. Restor. Ecol. 6: 20-28.
3. Järvinen, M. & K. Salonen. 1998. Influence of changing food web structure on nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in a highly humic lake. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 2562-2571.
4. Kurkilahti, M., M. Appelberg, E. Bergstrand, & O. Enderlein, 1998. An indirect estimate of bimodal gillnet selectivity of smelt. J. Fish Biol. 52: 243-254.
5. Luokkanen, E., 1995. Vesikirppuyhteisön lajisto, biomassa ja tuotanto Vesijärven Enonselällä. Helsingin yliopiston Lahden tutkimus-ja koulutuskeskuksen raportteja ja selvityksiä 25: 1-53. [in Finnish].
6. Mannio, J., A. Räike, & J. Vuorenmaa, 2000. Finnish lake survey 1995: regional characteristics of lake chemistry. Verh. int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. 27: 362-367.
7. Meijer, M.-L., I. de Boois, M. Scheffer, R. Portielje & H. Hosper, 1999. Biomanipulation in shallow lakes of The Netherlands: an evaluation of 18 case studies. Hydrobiologia 408/409: 13-30.
8. Sammalkorpi, I., 2000. The role of fish behaviour in biomanipulation of a hypertrophic lake. Verh. int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. 27: 1464-1472.
9. Sarvala, J., H. Helminen, & J. Karjalainen, 2000, Restoration of Finnish lakes using fish removal: changes in the chlorophyll-phosphorus relationship indicate multiple controlling mechanisms. Verh. int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. 27: 1473-1479.
10. Shapiro, J., V. Lamarra, & M. Lynch, 1975. Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In P. L. Brezonik & J. L. Fox (eds), Water Quality Management through Biological Control. Rep. No. ENV-07-75-1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
11. Tammi, J., A. Lappalainen, J. Mannio, M. Rask, & J. Vuorenmaa, 1999. Effects of eutrophication on fish and fisheries in Finnish lakes - a survey based on random sampling. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 6: 1-14.