On the explanation of change in science and cognition

Science and Education

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 543-557

  Gilbert, John K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17744399521     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008648425947     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrams, E. & Wandersee, J.: 1995, 'How Does Biological Knowledge Grow?: A Study of Life Scientists' Research Practices', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(6), 649-663.
2. Brewer, W. & Samarapungavan, A.: 1991, 'Children's Theories vs. Scientific Theories: Differences in Reasoning or Differences in Knowledge?', in R. Hoffmann and D. Palermo (eds.), Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 209-232.
3. Chin, C. & Brewer, W.: 1993, "The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction', Review of Educational Research 63(1), 1-49.
4. Craik, K.: 1943, The Nature of Explanation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Dagher, Z.: 1995, 'Review of Studies on the Effectiveness of Instructional Analogies in Science Education', Science Education 79(3), 295-312.
6. Driver, R. & Easley, J.: 1978, 'Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students', Studies in Science Education 5, 61-84.
7. Duschl, R.: 1990, Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development, Teachers College Press, New York.
8. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A.: 1983, Mental Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
9. Gilbert, J. & Boulter, C.: 1998, 'Learning Science Through Models and Modelling', in B. Fraser and K. Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
10. Gilbert, J., Boulter, C. & Rutherford, M.: 1988a, 'Models in Explanations, Part 1: Horses for Courses?', International Journal for Science Education.
11. Gilbert, J., Osborne, R. & Fensham, P.: 1982, 'Children's Science and its Consequences for Teaching', Science Education 66(4), 623-633.
12. Gilbert, N. & Mulkay, M.: 1984, Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Hammer, D.: 1994, 'Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics', Cognition and Instruction 12(2), 151-183.
14. Hennessy, S.: 1993, 'Situated Cognition and Cognitive Apprenticeship: Implications for Classroom Learning', Studies in Science Education 22, 1-41.
15. Hesse, M. : 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Sheen and Ward, London.
16. Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1983, Mental Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Justi, R. & Gilbert, J.: (in press), 'History and Philosophy of Science through Models: The Case of Chemical Kinetics', Science & Education.
18. Kuhn, T. : 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
19. Kuhn, T.: 1977, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
20. Lakatos, I.: 1974, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 91-196.
21. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.: L979, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, California.
22. Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and Its Problems, Routledge and Kegan Paul London.
23. Lederman, N.: 1992, 'Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(4), 331-359
24. Lythcott, J.: 1985, 'Aristotelian Was Given as the Answer, But What Was the Question?', American Journal of Physics 53, 279-281.
25. Mackay, L.: 1971, 'Development of Understanding About the Nature of Science', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 8(1), 57-66.
26. McClelland, J.: 1984, 'Alternative Frameworks: Interpretation of Evidence', European Journal of Science Education 6(1), 1-6.
27. McCloskey, M.: 1983, 'Naive Theories of Motion', in D. Gentner and A. Stevens (eds.), Mental Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
28. Nersessian, N.: 1992, 'How Do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science' in: R. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 3-44.
29. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. & McGilhcuddy, K.: 1996, Explaining Science in the Classroom, Open University Press, Buckingham.
30. Piaget, J. & Garcia, R.: 1989, Psychogenesis and the History of Science, Columbia University Press, N.Y.
31. Reif, F. & Larkin, J.: 1991, 'Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9), 733-760.
32. Shulman, L.: 1987, 'Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reforms', Harvard Educational Review 57(1), 1-22
33. Schwitzgebel, E.: 1999, 'Childrens' Theories and the Drive to Explain', Science & Education (this issue, 457-488).
34. Songer, N. & Linn, M.: 1991, 'How Do Students' Views of Science Influence Knowledge Integration?', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9), 761-784.
35. Thomas, G. & Durant, J.: 1987, 'Scientific Literacy: Issues and Perspectives', Scientific Literacy Papers 1, 1-14.
36. Watts, D. M.: 1982, 'Gravity: Don't Take it for Granted', Physics Education 17(1), 116-121.
37. Wong, D.: 1996, 'Students' Scientific Explanations and the Contexts in Which They Occur', The Elementary School Journal 96(5), 495-509.