Improving the Organisational Memory by recording decision making, rationale and team configuration

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Volumn 47, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 71-88

  Alvarado, Matías ^a   Bañares Alcántara, René ^b   Trujillo, Alfredo ^a  

^a INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL PETRÓLEO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision making process; Organisational Memory; Team configuration

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; REFLECTION; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION; PROPOSED ARCHITECTURES; WORK PROCESS; WORKFLOWS;

SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT;

OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION;

EID: 17744397597     PISSN: 09204105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2004.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Alvarado M. Romero-Salcedo L. Sheremetov A corporative memory based on the user profiles Expert Systems with Applications 26 (1) 2004 Elsevier Science 87-94
2. M. Armstrong P.A. Dowd Geostatical Simulations 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers
3. Autonomy Inc., 2004. consult: 18-05-2004, http://www.autonomy.com/.
4. R. Banares-Alcantara Design support systems for process engineering. I. Requirements and proposes solutions for a design process representation Comput. Chem. Eng. 19 3 1995 267-277
5. R. Banares-Alcantara Design support systems for process engineering. II. KBDS: An experimental prototype Comput. Chem. Eng. 19 3 1995 267-277
6. Banares-Alcantara, R., King, J.M.P., 1997. Design support systems for process engineering. III. Design rationale as a requirement for effective support, Comput. Chem. Eng. 21 (3), 267-3-276.
7. P.I. Barton C.C. Pantelides Modeling of combined discrete/continuous process AIChE J. 40 1994 966-979
8. B. Bayer W. Marquardt Towards integrated information models for data and documents Comput. Chem. Eng. 28 8 2004 1249-1266
9. A. Brice W. Johns C. Castell R. Banares-Alcantara P. Leboulleoux L. Sellin Improving process design by improving the design process AIChE Annual Meeting, Miami, USA 1998 15-20 November
10. R. Dieng O. Corby A. Giboin M. Riviere Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 51 1999 567-598
11. Dignum, Virginia, 2004. A model for organizational interaction, PhD thesis. Department of Information and Computer Science, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
12. Daniel Goleman Emotional Intelligence 1995 Bantam Books New York
13. L. Lee K.Y. Lai What's in design rationale? Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6 1991 251-280
14. Martínez-Miranda, J., Aldea, A., Bañares-Alcántara, R., 2003. Simulation of work teams using a multi-agent system-International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS 2003), 14-18 July, Melbourne, Australia
15. Martínez-Miranda, J., Aldea, A., Bañares-Alcántara, R., in press. Modelling human behaviour at work using fuzzy logic: The challenge of work teams configuration. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.
16. A. McKay A. de Pennington Towards an integrated description of product, process and supply chain Int. J. Technol. Manag. 21 3-4 2001 203-220
17. A. McLean R.M. Young T. Moran Questions, options and criteria: Elements of the design space analysis Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6 1991 201-250
18. M. Perrin S. Schneider Beiting Zhu J.F. Rainaud Knowledge-driven applications for geological modeling J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 47 2005 89-104 (this volume)
19. A. Rabarijaona R. Dieng O. Corby R. Ouaddari Building and searching an XML corporate memory IEEE Intell. Syst. Their Appl. 15 3 2000 56-63
20. H.W.J. Rittel M.M. Webber Dilemmas in a general theory of planning Policy Sci. 4 1973 155-169
21. R.E. Sheriff (Ed.) Reservoir Geophysics 1992 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa
22. R.E. Sheriff L.P. Geldart Exploration Seismology I 1995 Cambridge University Press
23. R.E. Sheriff L.P. Geldart Exploration Seismology II 1995 Cambridge University Press
24. F. Shipman R. McCall Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: Supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 11 2 1997 141-154
25. G. Stephanopoulos G. Henning H. Leone MODEL.LA. A modelling language for process engineering. I. The formal framework Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 8 1990 813-846
26. G. Stephanopoulos G. Henning H. Leone MODEL.LA. A modelling language for process engineering. II. Multifaceted modelling of processing systems Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 8 1990 847-869
27. E. Subrahmanian S.L. Konda S.N. Levy Y. Reich A.W. Westerberg I. Monarch Equations aren't enough: Informal modelling in design AIEDAM 7 4 1993 257-274
28. C.A. Tacla J.P. Barthés A multi-agent system for acquiring and sharing lessons learned Comput. Ind. 52 1 2003 5-16
29. C.A. Tacla F. Enembreck Organizing R&D experiences using agents In: T. Vidal P. Liberatore (Eds.) Proceedings of STAIRS 2002 IOS Press Lyon, France 1-10
30. S. Tuolmin The Uses of Argument 1958 Cambridge University Press
31. L. van Elst A. Abecker Ontologies for information management: Balancing formality, stability and sharing scope Expert Syst. Appl. 23 4 2002 357-366
32. Verity, Inc., 2004. Intellectual Capital Management, consult: 05-18-2004, http://www.verity.com/.
33. A.W. Westerberg E. Subrahmanian Y. Reich S. Konda D.P. Cunningham A.H. Dutoit H.L. Granger K.C. Marshall R.C. Milliken I.A. Momarch J.P. Neergaard R.H. Patrick M.E. Thomas Designing the design process Comput. Chem. Eng. 21 1997 S1-S9 (Suppl.)