Computer automated multi-paradigm modelling for analysis and design of traffic networks

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages 249-257

  Vangheluwe, Hans ^a   De Lara, Juan ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; GRAPHIC METHODS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

COMPUTER AUTOMATED MULTI-PARADIGM MODELING (CAM-PAM); COVERABILITY GRAPHS; META MODELING; MODEL ABSTRACTION;

COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING;

EID: 17744396159     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. 3: A tool for multi-formalism and meta-modelling. In European Joint Conference on Theory And Practice of Software (ETAPS), Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE), LNCS 2306, 174-188: Springer-Verlag. Grenoble, France.
2. de Lara, J., and H. Vangheluwe. 2004, June - August. Defining visual notations and their manipulation through meta-modelling and graph transformation. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 15 (3-4): 309-330. Special Issue on Domain-Specific Modeling with Visual Languages.
3. de Lara Jaramillo, J., H. Vangheluwe, and M. Alfonseca Moreno. 2003, February. Using meta-modelling and graph grammars to create modelling environments. In Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, ed. P. Bottoni and M. Minas, Volume 72: Elsevier. 15 pages. Available online via 〈www.elsevier.n~1/locate/entcs/volume72.html〉 [accessed August 15, 2004].
4. Ehrig, H., G. Engels, H.-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg. 1999. Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation, vol. 2: Applications, languages, and tools. World Scientific.
5. Engstrom, E., and J. Krueger. 2000, September. A Meta-Modeler's Job is Never Done: Building and Evolving Domain-Specific Tools With DOME. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design, 83-88. Anchorage, Alaska.
6. Karsai, G., G. Nordstrom, A. Ledeczi, and J. Sztipanovits. 2000. September. Specifying Graphical Modeling Systems Using Constraint-based Metamodels. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design, 89-94. Anchorage, Alaska.
7. Kelly, S., and J.-P. Tolvanen. 2000. Visual domain-specific modeling: Benefits and experiences of using metacase tools. In Proceedings of the International workshop on Model Engineering, ECOOP 2000, ed. J. Bezivin and J. Ernst, 9 pp. Available online via 〈www.metamodel.com/IWME00/〉 [accessed August 15, 2004].
8. Mosterman, P. J., and H. Vangheluwe. 2002. Computer Automated Multi-Paradigm Modeling. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 12 (4): 1-7. Special Issue Guest Editorial.
9. Murata, T. 1989, April. Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 77 (4): 541-580.
10. Papacostas, C., and P. Prevedouros. 1992, October. Transportation engineering and planning. Second ed. Prentice Hall.
11. Vangheluwe, H. 2000, September. DEVS as a common denominator for multi-formalism hybrid systems modelling. In IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, ed. A. Varga, 129-134: IEEE Computer Society Press. Anchorage, Alaska.