Exploring agent-supported simulation brokering on the semantic web: Foundations for a dynamic composability approach

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages 766-773

  Yilmaz, Levent ^a   Ören, Tuncer I ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INTEROPERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AGENT-SUPPORTED SIMULATION; MULTISIMULATION FORMALISMS; RUNTIME MODEL DISCOVERY; SEMANTIC WEB (SW);

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 17744395129     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bankes S. 1993. Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis. Operations Research, Vol 4. No. 3, 435-449.
2. Berners-Lee T., J. Hendler, and O. Lassila 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May Issue. Available online via http://www.sciam.com/ article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=1&articleID=0048144-10D2-1C70- 84A9809EC588EF21 [accessed August 1, 2004].
3. Brutzman D., K. J. Morse, M. Pullen, and M. Zyda 2002. Extensible Modeling and Simulation Framework (XMSF): Challenges for Web-Based Modeling and Simulation, Interim Technical Report. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California. Available online via http://www.movesinstitute.org/xmsf/workshop/ XmsfWorkshopReportDraft.pdf [accessed August 1, 2004].
4. Dahmann J., J.O. Calvin, and R. Weatherly 1999. A reusable architecture for simulations. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No.9, 79-84.
5. Davis K. P. and A. R. Anderson 2003. Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations, RAND.
6. Fujimoto R., D. Lunceford, E. Page, and A. Uhrmacher 2002. Technical Report of the Dagstuhl-Seminar Grand Challenges for Modeling and Simulation.
7. Guizzo E. 2003. Software and the City. IEEE Spectrum, Available online via http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/wonews/dec03/1203urb.html [accessed August 1, 2004].
8. Mikalsen T. and I. Rouvellou 2002. Transactional attitudes: Reliable composition of autonomous Web services, IBM Watson Research Center, Available on-line via http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2002-04-03-a.html [accessed February 10, 2004].
9. Murphy P. J., A. Mills-Tettey, L. F. Wilson, Greg Johnston, B. Xie 2003. Demonstrating the ABELS System Using Real-World Scenarios, In Proceedings of the SAINT 2003.
10. OWL Services Coalition 2004. OWL-S: Semantic Mark-up for Web Services. Available online via http://www.daml,org/services/owl-s/1.0/owl-s.html [accessed April 04, 2004].
11. Ören T.I. 2001. Towards a Modelling Formalism for Conflict Management, In: Discrete Event Modeling and Simulation: A Tapestry of Systems and AI-based Theories and Methodologies, H.S. Sarjoughian and F.E. Cellier (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 93-106.
12. Peteet J, John P. Murphy, and Linda F. Wilson 2003. Matchmaking in the ABELS System for Linking Distributed Simulations. In Proceedings of the 15TH European Simulation Symposium.
13. Singhal S. and M. Zyda 1999. Networked Virtual Environment: Design and Implementation, Boston, Addison-Wesley.
14. White L. E and J. M. Pullen 2003. Adapting Legacy Computational Software for XMSF, Simulation Interoperability Workshop (SIW), Fall 2003, Orlando, Florida.