Neurobiology of rehabilitation

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1038, Issue , 2004, Pages 148-170

  Dobkin, Bruce H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Neural regeneration; Neuroimaging; Neurologic rehabilitation; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN STEM; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENE THERAPY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MORPHOLOGY; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL DISEASE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGENERATION; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

PRIMATES; RODENTIA;

EID: 17744384532     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1315.024     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (154)

1. DOBKIN, B. 2003. The Clinical Science of Neurologic Rehabilitation. Oxford University Press. New York.
2. DOBKIN, B. 2000. Functional rewiring of brain and spinal cord after injury: the three R's of neural repair and neurological rehabilitation. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 13: 655-659.
3. RALSTON, D. & H. RALSTON. 1985. The terminations of corticospinal tract axons in the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 242: 325-337.
4. CHENEY, P., J. HILL-KARRER, A. BELHAJ-SAIF, et al. 2000. Cortical motor areas and their properties: implications for neuroprosthetics. In Neural Plasticity and Regeneration. F. Seil, Ed.: 136-160. Elsevier. Amsterdam.
5. BUONOMANO, D. & M. MERZENICH. 1998. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21: 149-186.
6. GRAZIAN, M., C. TAYLOR & T. MOORE. 2002. Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex. Neuron 34: 841-851.
7. NUDO, R., B. WISE, F. SIFUENTES & G. MILLIKEN. 1996. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: 1791-1794.
8. FROST, S., S. BARBAY, K. FRIEL, et al. 2003. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 3205-3214.
9. CLASSEN, J., J. LIEFERT, S. WISE, et al. 1998. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1117-1123.
10. BUTEFISCH, C., B. DAVIS, L. SAWAKI, et al. 2002. Modulation of use-dependent plasticity by d-amphetamine. Ann. Neurol. 51: 59-68.
11. EDER, M., W. ZIEGLGANSBERGER & H.U. DODT. 2002. Neocortical long-term potentiation and long-term depression: site of expression investigated by infrared-guided laser stimulation. J. Neurosci. 22: 7558-7568.
12. GRUTZENDLER, J., N. KASTHURI & W.B. GAN. 2002. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 420: 812-816.
13. BURY, S. & T. JONES. 2002. Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the "unaffected" forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 22: 8597-8606.
14. RIZZOLATTI, G., L. FOGASSI, V. GALLESE. 2001. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2: 661-670.
15. KOSKI, L., A. WOHLSCHLAGER, H. BEKKERING, et al. 2002. Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cereb. Cortex 12: 847-855.
16. VILLABLANCA, J. & D. HOVDA. 2000. Developmental neuroplasticity in a model of cerebral hemispherectomy and stroke. J. Neurosci. 95: 625-637.
17. BELHAJ-SAIF, A. & P. CHENEY. 2000. Plasticity in the distribution of the red nucleus output to forearm muscles after unilateral lesions of the pyramidal tract. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 3147-3153.
18. KWON, B., J. LIU, C. MESSERER, et al. 2002. Survival and regeneration of rubrospinal neurons 1 year after spinal cord injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 3246-3251.
19. ROSSIGNOL, S., L. BOUYER, D. BARTHELEMY, et al. 2002. Recovery of locomotion in the cat following spinal cord lesions. Brain Res Rev 40: 257-266.
20. DE LEON, R., J. HODGSON, R. ROY & V. EDGERTON. 1998. Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1329-1340.
21. ROSSIGNOL, S., C. CHAU, E. BRUSTEIN, et al. 1998. Pharmacological activation and modulation of the central pattern generator for locomotion in the cat. Ann N.Y. Acad Sci. 860: 346-359.
22. EDGERTON, V. & R. ROY. 2002. Paralysis recovery in human and model systems. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12: 658-667.
23. CALANCIE, B., B. NEEDHAM-SHROPSHIRE, B. GREEN, et al. 1994. Involuntary stepping after chronic spinal cord injury. Brain 117: 1143-1159.
24. DOBKIN, B., S. HARKEMA, P. REQUEJO & V. EDGERTON. 1995. Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete chronic spinal cord injury. J. Neurol. Rehabil. 9: 183-190.
25. EDGERTON, V., S. HARKEMA & B. DOBKIN. 2003. Retraining the human spinal cord. In Spinal Cord Medicine: Principles and Practice. V. Lin, Ed.: 817-828. Demos Medical Publishing. New York.
26. DIMITRIJEVIC, M.R., Y. GERASIMENKO & M.M. PINTER. 1998. Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 860: 360-376.
27. GRILLNER, S. & P. WALLEN. 2002. Cellular bases of a vertebrate locomotor system-steering, intersegmental and segmental co-ordination and sensory control. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 40: 92-106.
28. TILLAKARATNE, N. 2000. Increased expression of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD67) in feline lumbar spinal cord after complete thoracic spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 60: 219-230.
29. TILLAKARATNE, N., R. DE LEON, T. HOANG, et al. 2002. Use-dependent modulation of inhibitory capacity in the feline lumbar spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 22: 3130-3143.
30. BIZZI, E., M. TRESCH, P. SALTIEL & A. D'AVELLA. 2000. New perspectives on spinal motor systems. Nature Rev/Neurosci. 1: 101-108.
31. POPPELE, R. & G. BOSCO. 2003. Sophisticated spinal contributions to motor control. Trends Neurosci. 26: 269-276.
32. DIETZ, V. 2003. Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114: 1379-1389.
33. CAPADAY, C. 2002. The special nature of human walking and its neural control. Trends Neurosci 25: 370-376.
34. HARKEMA, S., S. HURLEY, U. PATEL, et al. 1997. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 797-811.
35. DUYSENS, J., F. CLARAC & H. CRUSE. 2000. Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects. Physiol. Rev. 80: 83-133.
36. DIETZ, V., R. MULLER & G. COLOMBO. 2002. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain 125: 2626-2634.
37. SCOTT, S. 2002. Optimal strategies for movement: success with variability. Nat. Neurosci. 5: 1110-1111.
38. KWAKKEL, G., R. VAN PEPPEN, R. WAGENAAR, et al. 2004. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 35: 2529-2539.
39. KWAKKEL, G., R. WAGENAAR, J. TWISK, et al. 1999. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle cerebral artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 354: 191-196.
40. DEAN, C. & R. SHEPHERD. 1997. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke 28: 722-728.
41. DEAN, C., C. RICHARDS & F. MALOUIN. 2000. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81: 409-417.
42. WINSTEIN, C., A. MERIANS & K. SULLIVAN. 1999. Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 37: 975-987.
43. TAUB, E., G. USWATTE & T. ELBERT. 2002. New treatments in neurorehabiltation founded on basic research. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3: 228-236.
44. SULLIVAN, K., B. KNOWLTON & B. DOBKIN. 2002. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83: 683-691.
45. PULVERMULLER, F., B. NEININGER, T. ELBERT, et al. 2001. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 32: 1621-1626.
46. BHOGAL, S., R. TEASELL & M. SPEECHLEY. 2003. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 34: 987-993.
47. KARNI, A., G. MEYER, P. JEZZARD, et al. 1995. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377: 155-158.
48. KARNI, A., G. MEYER, C. HIPOLITO, et al. 1998. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: Fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 861-868.
49. MUELLBACHER, W., U. ZIEMANN, J. WISSEL, et al. 2002. Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex. Nature 415: 640-644.
50. YIN, P. & S. KITAZAWA. 2001. Long-lasting aftereffects of prism adaptation in the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 141: 250-253.
51. NUDO, R., G. MILLIKEN, W. JENKINS & M. MERZENICH. 1996. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J. Neurosci. 16: 785-807.
52. PAZ, R., T. BORAUD, C. NATAN, et al. 2003. Preparatory activity in motor cortex reflects learning of local visuomotor skills. Nat. Neurosci. 8: 882-890.
53. GRIBBLE, P. & S. SCOTT. 2002. Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching. Nature 417: 938-941.
54. TODOROV, E. & M. JORDAN. 2000. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5: 1226-1235.
55. SHADMEHR, R. & Z. MOUSSAVI. 2000. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements. Neuroscience 20: 7807-7815.
56. THOROUGHMAN, K. & R. SHADMEHR. 2000. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742-747.
57. DONCHIN, O., L. SAWAKI, G. MADUPU, et al. 2002. Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 2114-2123.
58. BARBEAU, H., K. NORMAN, J. FUNG, et al. 1998. Does neurorehabilitation play a role in the recovery of walking in neurological populations? Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 860: 377-382.
59. DOBKIN, B. 1999. Overview of treadmill locomotor training with partial body weight support: a neurophysiologically sound approach whose time has come for randomized clinical trials. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 13: 157-165.
60. VISINTIN, M., H. BARBEAU, N. KORNER-BITENSKY & N. MAYO. 1998. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 29: 1122-1128.
61. NILSSON, L., J. CARLSSON, A. DANIELSSON, et al. 2002. Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground. Clin. Rehabil. 15: 515-527.
62. DOBKIN, B., D. APPLE, H. BARBEAU, et al. 2003. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 17: 153-167.
63. LIEFERT, J., H. BAUDER, W. MILTNER, et al. 2000. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31: 1210-1216.
64. DROMERICK, A., D. EDWARDS & M. HAHN. 2000. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 31: 2984-2988.
65. WOLF, S., S. BLANTON, H. BAER, et al. 2002. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist 8: 325-338.
66. VAN DER LEE, J. 2001. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 14: 741-744.
67. KOZLOWSKI, D., D. JAMES & T. SCHALLERT. 1996. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J. Neurosci. 16: 4776-4786.
68. TILLERSON, J.L., A.D. COHEN, W.M. CAUDLE, et al. 2002. Forced nonuse in unilateral parkinsonian rats exacerbates injury. J. Neurosci. 22: 6790-6799.
69. WINSTEIN, C., J. MILLER, S. BLANTON, et al. 2003. Methods for a multi-site randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 17: 137-152.
70. CAURAUGH, J., K. LIGHT, S. KIM, et al. 2000. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography- triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke 31: 1360-1364.
71. VOLPE, B., H. KREBS, N. HOGAN, et al. 2000. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 54: 1938-1944.
72. FASOLI, S., I. KREBS, J. STEIN, et al. 2003. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84: 477-482.
73. MATTAY, V., J. CALLICOTT, A. BERTOLINO, et al. 2000. Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. NeuroImage 12: 268-275.
74. GU, Q. 2002. Neuromodulatory transmitter systems in the cortex and their role in cortical plasticity. Neuroscience 111: 815-835.
75. GOLDSTEIN, L. 1999. Amphetamine-facilitated poststroke recovery. Stroke 30: 696-697.
76. STROEMER, R., T. KENT & C. HULSEBOSCH. 1998. Enhanced neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis and behavioral recovery with d-amphetamine therapy after neocortical infarction in rats. Stroke 29: 2381-2395.
77. SCHEIDTMANN, K., W. FRIES, F. MULLER & E. KOENIG. 2001. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blinded study. Lancet 358: 787-790.
78. GRADE, C., B. REDFORD, J. CHROSTOWSKI, et al. 1998. Methylphenidate in early poststroke reovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79: 1047-1050.
79. CONNER, J., A. CULBERSON, C. PACKOWSKI, et al. 2003. Lesions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system impair task acquisition and abolish cortical plasticity associated with motor skill learning. Neuron 38: 819-829.
80. PARIENTE, J., I. LOUBINOUX, C. CAREL, et al 2001. Fluoxetine modulates motor performance and cerebral activation of patients recovering from stroke. Ann. Neurol. 50:718-729.
81. RAGERT, P., H. DINSE, B. PLEGER, et al. 2003. Combination of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and tactile coactivation boosts tactile discrimination in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 348: 105-108.
82. KORCHOUNOV, A., T.V. ILIC & U. ZIEMANN. 2003. The alpha-adrenergic agonist guanfacine reduces excitability of human motor cortex through disfacilitation and increase inhibition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114: 1834-1840.
83. GOLDSTEIN, L., A. DROMERICK, D. GOOD, et al. 2002. Possible time window for the detrimental effects of drugs on poststroke recovery. Neurology(Suppl. 3) 58: A5-6.
84. KESSLER, J., A. THIEL, H. KARBE & W. HEISS. 2000. Piracetam improves activated blood flow and facilitates rehabilitation of poststroke aphasic patients. Stroke 31: 2112-2116.
85. WALKER-BATSON, D., S. CURTIS, R. NATARAJAN, et al. 2001. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke 32: 2093-2098.
86. DINSE, H., P. RAGERT, B. PLEGER, et al. 2003. Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization. Science 301: 91-94.
87. KANDEL, E. 2001. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue betweeen genes and synapses. Science 294: 1030-1038.
88. GELBER, D., D. GOOD, A. DROMERICK, et al. 2001. Open-label dose-titration safety and efficacy study of tizanidine hydrochloride in the treatment of spasticity associated with chronic stroke. Stroke 32: 1841-1846.
89. BRASHEAR, A., M. GORDON, E. ELOVIC, et al. 2002. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 347: 395-400.
90. ORSNES, G., C. CRONE, C. KRARUP, et al. 2000. The effect of baclofen on the transmission in spinal pathways in spastic multiple sclerosis patients. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111: 1372-1379.
91. RéMY-NéRIS, O., H. BARBEAU, O. DANIEL, et al. 1999. Effects of intrathecal clonidine injection on spinal reflexes and human locomotion in incomplete paraplegic subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 129: 433-440.
92. MIRBAGHERI, M.M., H. BARBEAU, M. LADOUCEUR & R.E. KEARNEY. 2001. Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic spinal cord injured subjects. Exp Brain Res 141: 446-459.
93. DIETZ, V., 2000. Spastic movement disorder. Spinal Cord 38: 389-393.
94. HORNBY, T.G., W.Z. RYMER, E.N. BENZ & B.D. SCHMIT. 2003. Windup of flexion reflexes in chronic human spinal cord injury: a marker for neuronal plateau potentials? J. Neurophysiol. 89: 416-426.
95. BOROOJERDI, B., U. ZIEMANN, R. CHEN, et al. 2001. Mechanisms underlying human motor system plasticity. Muscle Nerve 24: 602-613.
96. ALPERT, N.M., R.D. BADGAIYAN, E. LIVNI & A.J. FISCHMAN. 2003. A novel method for noninvasive detection of neuromodulatory changes in specific neurotransmitter systems. Neuroimage 19: 1049-1060.
97. GOERENDT, I.K., C. MESSA, A.D. LAWRENCE, et al. 2003. Dopamine release during sequential finger movements in health and Parkinson's disease: a PET study. Brain 126: 312-325.
98. DOBKIN, B. 2003. Do electrically stimulated sensory inputs and movements lead to long-term plasticity and rehabilitation gains? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 16: 686-691.
99. TALWAR, S., S. Xu, E. HAWLEY, et al. 2002. Rat navigation guided by remote control. Nature 417: 37-38.
100. SCHIFF, N.& K. PURPURA. 2002. Towards a neurophysiological foundation for cognitive neuromodulaion through deep brain stimulation. Thalamus and Related Systems 2: 55-69.
101. BRIGHINA, F., E. BISIACH, M. OLIVERI, et al. 2003. 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic Stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 336: 131-133.
102. KEMNA, L.J. & D. GEMBRIS. 2003. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces different responses in different cortical areas: a functional magnetic resonance study in humans. Neurosci.Lett. 336: 85-88.
103. TAYLOR, D., S. HELMS TILLERY & A. SCHWARTZ. 2002. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296: 1829-1831.
104. VAUGHAN, T., W. HEETDERKS, L. TREJO, et al. 2003. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the Second International Meeting. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11: 94-109.
105. ZECK, G. & P. FROMHERZ. 2001. Noninvasive neuroelectronic interfacing with synaptically connected snail neurons imobilized on a semiconductor chip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 10457-10462.
106. DOBKIN, B. 2003. Functional MRI: A potential physiologic indicator for stroke rehabilitation interventions. Stroke 34: e23-24.
107. DIJKHUIZEN, R.M., A.B. SINGHAL, J.B. MANDEVILLE, et al 2003. Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 23: 510-517.
108. CALAUTTI, C. & J.-C. BARON. 2003. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 34: 1553-1566.
109. SMALL, S., P. HLUSTIK, D. NOLL, et al. 2002. Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke. Brain 125: 1544-1557.
110. JOHANSEN-BERG, H., H. DAWES, C. GUY, et al. 2002. Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain 125: 2731-2742.
111. WARD, N., N. BROWN, A. THOMPSON & R. FRACKOWIAK. 2003. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 126: 1430-1448.
112. FEYDY, A., R. CARLIER, A. ROBY-BRAMI, et al. 2002. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: Recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 33: 1610-1617.
113. NELLES, G., W. JENTZEN, M. JUEPTNER, et al. 2001. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studies with serial positron emission tomography. NeuroImage 13: 1146-1154.
114. DOBKIN, B., A. FIRESTINE, M. WEST, et al. 2004. Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation. NeuroImage 23: 370-381.
115. FRASER, C., M. POWER, S. HAMDY, et al. 2002. Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 34: 831-840.
116. CARMICHAEL, S. & M.-F. CHESSELET. 2002. Synchronous neuronal activity is a signal for axonal sprouting after cortical lesions in the adult rat. J. Neurosci. 22: 6062-6070.
117. CARMICHAEL, S. 2003. Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. Neuroscientist 9: 64-73.
118. ARVIDSSON, A., T. COLLIN, D. KIRIK, et al. 2002. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nature Med 8: 963-970.
119. KATSMAN, D., J. ZHENG, K. SPINELLI & S. CARMICHAEL. 2003. Tissue microenvironments within functional cortical subdivisions adjacent to focal stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 23: 997-1009.
120. CALABRESI, P., D. CENTONZE, A. PISANI, et al. 2003. Synaptic plasticity in the ischaemic brain. Lancet Neurol 2: 622-629.
121. READ, S., A. PARSONS, D. HARRISON, et al. 2001. Stroke genomics: approaches to identify, validate, and understand ischemic stroke gene expression. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21: 755-778.
122. SAVITZ, S., D. ROSENBAUM, J. DINSMORE, et al. 2002. Cell transplantation for stroke. Ann. Neurol. 52: 266-275.
123. LI, Y., J. CHEN, X. CHEN, et al. 2002. Human marrow stromal cell therapy for stroke in rat: neurotrophins and functional recovery. Neurology 59: 514-523.
124. JOHANSSON, B. 1999. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 31: 223-230.
125. EMERICK, A., E. NEAFSEY, M. SCHWAB & G. KARTJE. 2003. Functional reorganization of the motor cortex in adult rats after cortical lesion and treatment with monoclonal antibody IN-1. J. Neurosci. 23: 4826-4830.
126. MERKLER, D., G. METZ, O. RAINETEAU, et al. 2001. Locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured rats treated with an antibody neutralizing the myelin-associated neunte growth inhibitor Nogo-A. J. Neurosci. 21: 3665-3673.
127. SICOTTE, M., O. TSATAS, S.Y. JEONG, et al. 2003. Immunization with myelin or recombinant Nogo-66/MAG in alum promotes axon regeneration and sprouting after corticospinal tract lesions in the spinal cord. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 23: 251-263.
128. GRANDPRE, T., S. LI & S. STRITTMATTER. 2002. Nogo-66 receptor antagonist peptide promotes axonal regeneration. Nature 417: 547-551.
129. FOURNIER, A.E., B.T. TAKIZAWA & S.M. STRITTMATTER. 2003. Rho kinase inhibition enhances axonal regeneration in the injured CNS. J. Neurosci. 23: 1416-1423.
130. DERGHAM, P., B. ELLEZAM, C. ESSAGIAN, et al. 2002. Rho signaling pathway targeted to promote spinal cord repair. J. Neurosci. 22: 6570-6577.
131. DUBREUIL, C., M. WINTON & L. MCKERRACHER. 2003. Rho activation patterns after spinal cord injury and the role of activated Rho in apoptosis in the central nervous system. J. Cell Biol. 162: 233-243.
132. CAI, D., J. QIU, Z. CAO, et al. 2001. Neuronal cyclic AMP controls the developmental loss in ability of axons to regenerate. J. Neurosci.21: 4731-4739.
133. BLESCH, A., P. LU & M. TUSZYNSKI. 2002. Neurotrophic factors, gene therapy, and neural stem cells for spinal cord repair. Brain Res. Bull. 57: 833-838.
134. DOBKIN, B. & L. HAVTON. 2004. Basic advances and new avenues in therapy of spinal cord injury. Annu. Rev. Med. 55: 255-282.
135. HOULE, J.D. & A. TESSLER. 2003. Repair of chronic spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 182: 247-260.
136. KONDZIOLKA, D., L. WECHSLER & C. ACHIM. 2002. Neural transplantation for stroke. J. Clin. Neurosci. 9: 225-230.
137. NELSON, P., D. KONDZIOLKA, L. WECHSLER, et al. 2002. Clonal human (hNT) neuron grafts for stroke therapy: neuropathology in a patient 27 months after implantation. Am. J. Pathol. 160: 1201-1206.
138. FREED, C., P. GREENE, R. BREEZE, et al. 2001. Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson's disease. New Engl. J. Med. 344: 710-719.
139. DUMONT, A.S., R.J. DUMONT & R. OSKOUIAN. 2002. Will improved understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in acute spinal cord injury improve the potential for therapeutic intervention? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 15: 713-720.
140. FADEN, A.I. 2002. Neuroprotection and traumatic brain injury: theoretical option or realistic proposition. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 15: 707-712.
141. HUNTER, A.J., K.B. MACKAY & D.C. ROGERS. 1998. To what extent have functional studies of ischaemia in animals been useful in the assessment of potential neuroprotective agents? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 19: 59-66.
142. GINSBERG, M.D. 2003. Adventures in the pathophysiology of brain ischemia: penumbra, gene expression, neuroprotection: the 2002 Thomas Willis lecture. Stroke 34: 214-223.
143. BLIGHT, A. 2000. Animal models of spinal cord injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 6: 1-13.
144. GREEN, A., T. ODERGREN & T. ASHWOOD. 2003. Animal models of stroke: do they have value for discovering neuroprotective agents? Trends Pharm. Sci. 24: 402-408.
145. KWON, B., T. OXLAND & W. TETZLAFF. 2002. Animal models used in spinal cord regeneration research. Spine 27: 1504-1510.
146. VAN DER HARST, J., A.-M. BAARS & B. SPRUIT. 2003. Standard housed rats are more sensitive to rewards than enriched housed rats as reflected by their anticipatory behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 142: 151-156.
147. WURBEL, H. 2001. Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behavior. Trends Neurosci. 24: 207-211.
148. WEBB, A., K. GOWRIBAI & G. MUIR. 2003. Fischer rats have different morphology, sensorimotor and locomotor capabilities compared to Lewis, Long-Evans, Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats. Behav. Brain Res. 144: 143-156.
149. RAMON-CUETO, A., M. CORDERO, F. SANTOS-BENITO & J. AVILA. 2000. Functional recovery of paraplegic rats and motor axon regeneration in their spinal cords by olfactory ensheathing glia. Neuron 25: 425-436.
150. LI, Y., P. DECHERCHI & G. RAISMAN. 2003. Transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells into spinal cord lesions restores breathing and climbing. J. Neurosci. 23: 727-731.
151. MURRAY, M., D. KIM, Y. LIU, et al. 2002. Transplantation of genetically modified cells contributes to repair from spinal injury. Brain Res. Rev. 40: 292-300.
152. TUSZYNSKI, M., R. GRILL, L. JONES, et al. 2003. NT-3 gene delivery elicits growth of chronically injured corticospinal axons and modestly improves functional deficits after chronic scar resection. Exp. Neurol. 181: 47-56.
153. KAKULAS, B. 1999. A review of the neuropathology of human spinal cord injury with emphasis on special features. J. Spinal Cord Med. 22: 119-124.
154. VILENSKY, J., A. MOORE, E. EIDELBERG & J. WALDEN. 1992. Recovery of locomotion in monkeys with spinal cord lesions. J. Mot. Behav. 24: 288-296.