Simple diastereoselectivity of the BF3·OEt 2-catalyzed vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reaction of 2-(trimethylsiloxy)furans with aldehydes

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 3654-3659

  Lopez, Carlos Silva ^a   Álvarez, Rosana ^a   Vaz, Belén ^a   Faza, Olalla Nieto ^a   De Lera, Ángel R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPLEXATION; CONFORMATIONS; DERIVATIVES;

DISTEREOSELECTIVITY; REACTANTS; TRANSITION STATES;

BORON COMPOUNDS;

2 (TRIMETHYLSILOXY)FURAN; ALDEHYDE; BUTENOLIDE; FURAN DERIVATIVE; GAMMA HYDROXYALKYLBUTENOLIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONFORMATION; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MUKAIYAMA REACTION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 17744381779     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo0501339     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mukaiyama, T.; Banno, K.; Narasaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7503-7509.
2. Mukaiyama, T.; Ishida, A. Chem. Lett. 1975, 6, 527-530.
3. Nelson, S. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 357-389.
4. Mukaiyama, T.; Ishida, A. Chem. Lett. 1975, 4, 319-322.
5. Mukaiyama, T.; Ishida, A. Chem. Lett. 1975, 11, 1201-1202.
6. Fleming, I.; Lee, T. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 705-708.
7. Casiraghi, G.; Zanardi, F. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1929-1972.
8. Asaoka, M.; Yanagida, N.; Ishibashi, K.; Takei, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 4269-4270.
9. Figadère, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 359-365.
10. Brückner, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2001, 141-152.
11. Brown, D. W.; Campbell, M. M.; Taylor, A. P.; an Zhang, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 985-988.
12. Jefford, C. W.; Jaggi, D.; Boukouvalas, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4037-4040.
13. Jefford, C. W.; Jaggi, D.; Boukouvalas, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4041-4044.
14. Szlosek, M.; Franck, X.; Figadère, B.; Cavé, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5169-5172.
15. von der Ohe, F.; Brückner, R. New J. Chem. 2000, 24, 659-669.
16. Takayama, H.; Kuwajima, T.; Kitajima, M.; Nonato, M. G.; Aimi, N. Heterocycles 1999, 50, 75-78.
17. Vaz, B.; Álvarez, R.; Brückner, R.; de Lera, A. R. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 545-548.
18. Seebach, D.; Prelog, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 654-660.
19. Santelli, M.; Pons, J.-M. Lewis Acids and Selectivity in Organic Synthesis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1996.
20. Analysis of the trends in energy values (Table 3) led us to consider these two transition states very high in energy, and therefore their existence should not alter the conclusions drawn.
21. + conformer has been called elsewhere "Diels-Alder-like". This transition state was considered to be favored under Lewis acid catalysis yielding the like (syn) aldol because of "favourable orbital interactions". In contrast, the alternative, termed "open-chain" (ap in our convention), transition state would be of lower energy under fluoride catalysis because the negative charge would be sparser. For a full discussion see ref 7.
22. Yu, Z.-X.; Wu, Y.-D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 421-432.
23. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
24. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
25. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
26. Peng, C.; Ayala, P. Y.; Schlegel, H. B.; Frisch, M. J. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 49-56.
27. Frisch, Æ.; Frisch, M. J. Gaussian 98 User's Reference, 2nd ed.; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1999.
28. Foresman, J. B.; Frisch, Æ. Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods, 2nd ed.; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
29. Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
30. Cramer, C. J. Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 2002.