Challenges of Model Interoperation in Military Simulations

Simulation

Volumn 80, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 659-667

  Hofmann, Marko A ^a  

^a BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

combat simulation; Interoperability; semiotics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; INTEROPERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MILITARY APPLICATIONS; MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS; MILITARY DATA PROCESSING; SEMANTICS; SEMIOTICS;

COMBAT SIMULATION; MILITARY SIMULATION SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 17744375388     PISSN: 00375497     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0037549704050997     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Tolk, A., and J. A. Muguira. 2003. The levels of conceptual interoperability model. In Proceedings of the 2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL.
2. Brutzman, Don, and Andreas Tolk. 2003. JSB composability and Web services interoperability via Extensible Modeling & Simulation Framework (XMSF), Model Driven Architecture (MDA), component repositories, and Web-based visualization. Study prepared for the Joint Synthetic Battlespace (JSB) Analysis of Technical Approaches (ATA) Studies & Prototyping, U.S. Air Force.
3. Zimmermann, B. 2003. Integrated army modeling and simulation data network. In Proceedings of the Conference on C3I and M&S Interoperability, October 9-10, Antalya, Turkey. NATO Publication RTO-MP-123.
4. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6. Sperper, D. 2004. Pragmatics-modularity-and-mindreading. Accessed from http://www.dan.sperber.com/pragmatics-modularity-and-mindreading.htm
7. Bach, K. 2003. The semantics-pragmatics-distinction. Accessed from http://online.sfsu.edu/%7Ekbach/semprag.html
8. Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. An on-line interview with Noam Chomsky: On the nature of pragmatics and related issues. 2003. Accessed from http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/01/26/cog00000126-00/chomsweb_399.html
10. Schwierz, K. 1995. Laborbetrieb IRIS. Friedrichshafen, Germany: DASA-Dornier.
11. Hofmann, M. 2000. Zur Abbildung von Führungsprozessen in hochauflösenden Gefechtssimulationssystemen. Ph.D. diss., Universität der Bundeswehr München.
12. Hofmann, H. W., T. Rochel, R. Schnurer, and A. Tolk. 1992. KOSMOS—Ein Gefechtssimulationsmodell auf Korps-/Armee-Ebene, Band 1: Beschreibung des Gefechtsmodells. IASFOR-Bericht S-9208, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg.
13. Hofmann, H. W., S. Litzbarski, T. Rochel, and K. Steiger. 1984. Basis—Ein Gefechtsmodell auf Btl/Rgt-Ebene, Band 1: Beschreibung des Gefechtsmodells. IASFOR-Bericht S-8401, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg.
14. Flood, R. L., and E. R. Carson. 1993. Dealing with complexity: an introduction to the theory and application of systems science. New York: Plenum.
15. Hartmann, J. K. 1985. Lecture notes in high resolution combat modelling and lecture notes in aggregated combat modelling. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
16. Davis, P. K., and J. Bigelow. 1998. Multi resolution modeling. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
17. Davis, Paul K., and Reiner K. Huber. 1992. Variable resolution modeling: Issues, principles and challenges. N-3400-DARPA. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
18. Hofmann, H. W., M. Hofmann, and V. Pötzsch. 2003. Standardisierung der automatischen Führungssimulation Heer. ITISBericht, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg.
19. Overstreet, C. M., R. E. Nance, and O. Balci. 2002. Issues in enhancing model reuse. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Grand Challenges for Modeling and Simulation, January, San Antonio, TX.