The monetary approach to exchange rates in the CEECs

Economics of Transition

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 395-416

  Crespo Cuaresma, Jesús ^a   Fidrmuc, Jarko ^b,c   MacDonald, Ronald ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b OESTERREICHISCHE NATIONALBANK   (Austria)

^c Faculty of Natural Sciences   (Slovakia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EMU; Exchange rates; Monetary model; Panel cointegration; Panel unit root tests

Indexed keywords

CURRENCY MARKET; EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION; EXCHANGE RATE; LEAST SQUARES METHOD;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EASTERN EUROPE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 17744362658     PISSN: 09670750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2005.00213.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Backé, P. and Fidrmuc, J. (2000). 'The impact of Russian crisis on selected Central and Eastern European countries', in Komulainen, T. and Korhonen, I. (eds.), Russian Crisis and Its Effects Helsinki: Kikimora Publications, pp. 199-238.
2. Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Second Edition. New York: Wiley.
3. Banerjee, A. (1999). 'Panel data unit roots and cointegration: An overview', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp. 607-29.
4. Chiang, M.-H. and Kao, C. (2002). Nonstationary Panel Time Series Using NPT 1.3 - A User Guide, Center for Policy Research, New York: Syracuse University, http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/maxpages/faculty/cdkao/ working/npt.html.
5. Clark, P. and MacDonald, R. (1999). 'Exchange rates and economic fundamentals: A methodological comparison of BEERs and FEERs', in MacDonald, R. and Stein, J. (eds.), Equilibrium Exchange Rates, Boston: Kluwer.
6. Clements, K. W. and Frenkel, J. A. (1980). 'Exchange rates, money, and relative prices: The dollar-pound in the 1920s', Journal of International Economics, 10, pp. 249-62.
7. Čech, Z., Horváth, R. and Komárek, L. (2003). 'ERM II membership - the view of the accession countries', Working Paper No. 11, Czech National Bank, Prague, http://www.cnb.cz/en/ vyz_cnb_working_paper_serries.php.
8. Égert, B. (2002). 'Investigating the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis in the transition: Do we understand what we see? A panel study', Economics of Transition, 10, pp. 1-36.
9. Égert, B. (2003). 'Assessing equilibrium real exchange rates in CEE accession countries: Can we have DEER with BEER without FEER? A critical survey', Focus on Transition, 2, pp. 38-106.
10. Égert, B., Drine, I., Lommatzsch, K. and Rault, C. (2003). 'The Balassa-Samuelson effect in Central and Eastern Europe: Myth or reality?' Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, pp. 552-72.
11. Fidrmuc, J. (2004). 'The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria, intra-industry trade, and EMU enlargement', Contemporary Economic Policy, 22, pp. 1-12.
12. Fidrmuc, J. and Korhonen, I. (2003). 'Similarity of supply and demand shocks between the euro area and the CEECs', Economic Systems, 27, pp. 313-34.
13. Frankel, J. A. and Rose, A. K. (1995). 'A panel project on purchasing power parity: Mean reversion within and between countries', Journal of International Economics, 40, pp. 209-24.
14. Froot, K. A. and Rogoff, K. (1995). 'Perspectives on PPP and long-run real exchange rates', in Jones, R. W. and Kenen, P. B. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 679-747.
15. Groen, J. (2000). 'The monetary exchange rate model as a long-run phenomenon', Journal of International Economics, 52, 299-319.
16. Hadri, K. (2000). 'Testing for stationarity in heterogenous panel data', Econometrics Journal, 3, pp. 148-61.
17. Halpern, L. and Wyplosz, C. (2001). 'Economic transformation and real exchange rates in the 2000s: The Balassa-Samuelson connection', Economic Survey of Europe, 1, pp. 227-39.
18. Hegwood, N. D. and Papell, D. H. (1998). 'Quasi purchasing power parity', International Journal of Finance and Economics, 3, pp. 279-89.
19. Hlouskova, J. and Wagner, M. (2003). Some Bugs in NPT 1.3. New York: Syracuse University, http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/maxpages/faculty/ cdkao/working/npt.html.
20. Horvath, J. and Jonas, J. (1998). 'Exchange rate regimes in the transition economies: Case study of the Czech Republic 1990-1997, Working Paper B11, Center for European Integration Studies, ZEI, Bonn, http://www.zei.de/zei_deutsch/publikation/publ_zeib_pp.htm.
21. Husted, S. and MacDonald, R. (1998). 'Monetary models of the exchange rate: A panel perspective', Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 8, pp. 1-19.
22. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (2003). 'Testing for unit root in heterogenous panels', Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53-74.
23. Kakkar, V. and Ogaki, M. (1999). 'Real exchange rates and nontradables: A relative price approach', Journal of Empirical Finance, 6, pp. 193-215.
24. Kao, C. (1999). 'Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data', Journal of Econometrics, 90, pp. 1-44.
25. Kao, C. and Chiang, M.-H. (2000). 'On the estimation and inference of cointegrated regression in panel data', in Baltagi, B. H. (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp. 179-222.
26. Kao, C., Chiang, M.-H. and Chen, B. (1999). 'International R&D spillovers: An application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp. 693-711.
27. Kim, B.-Y. and Korhonen, I. (2002). 'Equilibrium exchange rates in transition countries: Evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models', Discussion Paper No. 15, BOFIT, Helsinki, http://www.bof.fi/bofit/ eng/6dp/index.stm.
28. Kočenda, E. (2001). 'Macroeconomic convergence in transition countries', Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, pp. 1-29.
29. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992). 'Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?' Journal of Econometrics, 54, pp. 159-78.
30. Kutan, A. M. and Yigit, T. M. (2004). 'Nominal and real stochastic convergence of transition economies', Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, pp. 23-36.
31. Levin, A. and Lin, C.-F. (1992). 'Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties', Working Paper 23, San Diego: University of California, Department of Economics, http:// www.econ.ucsd.edu/papers/dp92.html.
32. Levin, A. and Lin, C.-F. (1993). 'Unit root tests in panel data: New results', Working Paper 56, San Diego: University of California, Department of Economics, http://www.econ.ucsd.edu/papers/dp93.html.
33. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F. and Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). 'Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties', Journal of Econometrics, 108, pp. 1-24.
34. Lucas, R. E. (1982). 'Interest rates and currency prices in a two-country world', Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, pp. 335-60.
35. MacDonald, R. (1995). 'Long-run exchange rate modeling: A survey of the recent evidence', IMF Staff Papers, 42, pp. 437-89.
36. MacDonald, R. (1996). 'Panel unit root tests and real exchange rates', Economics Letters, 50, pp. 7-11.
37. MacDonald, R. and Ricci, L. (2001). 'PPP and the Balassa-Samuelson effect: The role of the distribution sector', Working Paper 01/38, IMF, Washington, DC, http://www.imf.org/external/pubind.htm.
38. MacDonald, R. and Taylor, M. P. (1993). 'The monetary approach to the exchange rate', IMF Staff Papers, 40, pp. 89-107.
39. MacDonald, R. and Taylor, M. P. (1994). 'The monetary model of the exchange rate: Long-run relationships, short-run dynamics and how to beat a random walk', Journal of International Money and Finance, 13, pp. 276-90.
40. MacDonald, R. and Wójcik, C. (2004). 'Catching up: The role of demand, supply and regulated price effects on the real exchange rates of four countries', Economics of Transition, 12, pp. 153-79.
41. Mark, N. and Sul, D. (2001). 'Nominal exchange rates and monetary fundamentals: Evidence from a small post-Bretton Woods panel', Journal of International Economics, 53, pp, 29-52.
42. Meese, R. A. and Rogoff, K. (1983). 'Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies', Journal of International Economics, 14, pp. 3-24.
43. Pedroni, P. (1996). 'Fully modified OLS for heterogenous; cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity', Working Paper 96-020 Indiana University, Bloomington, http://www.indiana.edu/ ~iuecon/workpaps/PAPERS/acrobat/96020.pdf.
44. Pedroni, P. (2001). 'Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels', Review of Economics and Statistics 83, pp. 727-31.
45. Pesaran, H. M., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. P. (1999). 'Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, pp. 621-34.
46. Quah, D. (1992). International Pattern of Growth: Persistence in Growth Country Disparities. Mimeo. London: London School of Economics.
47. Quah, D. (1994). 'Exploiting cross-section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data', Economics Letters, 44, pp. 9-19.
48. Rahn, J. (2003). 'Bilateral equilibrium exchange rates of the EU accession countries against the euro', Discussion Paper No. 11, BOFIT, Helsinki, http://www.bof.fi/bofit/eng/6dp/index.stm.
49. Rogoff, K. (1996). 'The purchasing power parity puzzle', Journal of Economic Literature 34, pp. 647-668.
50. Šmidková, K., Barrell, R. and Holland, D. (2002). 'Estimates of fundamental real exchange rates for the five EU pre-accession countries', Working Paper No. 3, Czech National Bank, Prague, http://www.cnb.cz/en/ vyz_cnb_working_paper_series.php.
51. Taylor, A. M. (2001). 'Potential pitfalls for the purchasing power parity puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price', Econometrica, 69, pp. 473-98.