Kinematical limits on Higgs boson production via gluon fusion in association with jets

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2003, Pages

  Del Duca, V ^a   Kilgore, W ^b   Oleari, C ^c   Schmidt, C ^d   Zeppenfeld, D ^e  

^a SEZIONE DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; ENERGY; KINEMATICS; MASS; OSCILLATION;

EID: 17644442404     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.073003     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. R.N. Cahn, S.D. Ellis, R. Kleiss, and W.J. Stirling, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1626 (1987)
2. Phys. Rev. DV. Barger, T. Han, and R.J.N. Phillips, 37, 2005 (1988)
3. R. Kleiss and W.J. Stirling, Phys. Lett. B 200, 193 (1988);D. Froideveaux, in Proceedings of the ECFA Large Hadron Collider Workshop, Aachen, Germany, 1990, edited by G. Jarlskog and D. Rein (CERN Report No. 90-10, Geneva, Switzerland, 1990), Vol II, p. 444;M.H. Seymour, p. 557
4. U. Baur and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B347, 12 (1990)
5. U. BaurE.W.N. GloverPhys. Lett. B 252, 683 (1990).
6. Y.L. Dokshitzer, S.I. Troian, and V.A. Khoze, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46, 712 (1987)
7. J.D. Bjorken, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7, 4189 (1992)
8. J.D. BjorkenPhys. Rev. D 47, 101 (1993)
9. V. Barger, R.J.N. Phillips, and D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Lett. B 346, 106 (1995).
10. D. Zeppenfeld, R. Kinnunen, A. Nikitenko, and E. Richter-Was, Phys. Rev. D 62, 013009 (2000).
11. V. Del Duca, W. Kilgore, C. Oleari, C. Schmidt, and D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 122001 (2001).
12. V. Del Duca, W. Kilgore, C. Oleari, C. Schmidt, and D. Zeppenfeld, Nucl. Phys. B616, 367 (2001).
13. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, M.B. Voloshin, and V.I. Zakharov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30, 711 (1979).
14. J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B106, 292 (1976).
15. A. Djouadi, M. Spira, and P.M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 264, 440 (1991).
16. S. Dawson, Nucl. Phys. B359, 283 (1991).
17. U. Baur and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B339, 38 (1990).
18. E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov, and V.S. Fadin, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 71, 840 (1976) [Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 443 (1976)].
19. E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov, and V.S. Fadin, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 72, 377 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977)].
20. I.I. Balitsky and L.N. Lipatov, Yad. Fiz. 28, 1597 (1978) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 822 (1978)].
21. R.K. Ellis, I. Hinchliffe, M. Soldate, and J.J. van der Bij, Nucl. Phys. B297, 221 (1988).
22. V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 49, 177 (1994).
23. B.L. Combridge and C.J. Maxwell, Nucl. Phys. B239, 429 (1984).
24. V. Del Duca, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1527 (1995).
25. J.R. Andersen, V. Del Duca, F. Maltoni, and W.J. Stirling, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 048 (2001).
26. V. Del Duca, A. Frizzo, and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B568, 211 (2000).
27. V. Del Duca, Next-to-leading corrections to the BFKL equation, hep-ph/9605404.
28. M. Mangano and S.J. Parke, Phys. Rep. 200, 301 (1991).
29. R. Kleiss and W.J. Stirling, Nucl. Phys. B262, 235 (1985).
30. Z. Xu, D. Zhang, and L. Chang, Nucl. Phys. B291, 392 (1987).
31. T. Plehn, D. Rainwater, and D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 051801 (2002).
32. H.L. Lai, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1280 (1997).
33. G. Passarino and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B160, 151 (1979).
34. V. Del Duca, L. Dixon, and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B571, 51 (2000).
35. S. Dawson and R.P. Kauffman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2273 (1992).
36. F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele, Nucl. Phys. B306, 759 (1988).
37. R.P. Kauffman, S.V. Desai, and D. Risal, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4005 (1997).
38. V. Del Duca, W.B. Kilgore, and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B574, 851 (2000).
39. By convention, all particles are taken as outgoing, thus an incoming quark (gluon) of a given helicity is represented by an outgoing antiquark (gluon) of the opposite helicity.
40. We use the standard normalization of the fundamental representation matrices, (Formula presented) throughout.
41. In counting diagrams, we exploit Furry’s theorem and count as one the two charge-conjugation related diagrams where the loop momentum runs clockwise and counter-clockwise.
42. The normalization (Formula presented) is the origin of the factor (Formula presented) which we make explicit rather than carrying it over in the sub-amplitudes, as in Ref. 19. An additional factor 2 is pulled out in order to use the same normalization of the sub-amplitudes as in Ref. 28.
43. In performing parity inversion, there is a factor of (Formula presented) for each pair of quarks participating in the amplitude.
44. For the color ordering on the fermion line we choose the convention of Ref. 21, which is the opposite of the one used in Ref. 30.