Classroom interaction evaluation through sequential analysis of observational data

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 132-139

  Tójar, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Classroom observation techniques; Interaction process analysis; Research methodology and educational assessment; Sequential data analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 17644437622     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.12.2.132     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allison, P.D., & Liker, J.K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorial data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 91, (2), 393-403.
2. Amidon, E., & Hunter, E. (1966). Improving teaching: The analysis of classroom verbal Interaction. New York, Holt: Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
3. Anguera, M.T. (1988). Observación en la escuela. Barcelona: Grao.
4. Bakeman, R. (1983). Computing lag sequential analysis: The ELAG program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 15, 530-535.
5. Bakeman, R., & Dabbs, J.M. (1976). Social interaction observed: Some approaches to the analysis of behavior streams. Journal of Social and Personality Behavior, 2, 335-345.
6. Bakeman, R., & Gootman, J.M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bakeman, R., Adamson, L.B., & Strisik, P. (1988). Lags and logs: statistical approaches to interaction. In M.H. Bornstein & J. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 241-260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Bennet, S.N. (1975). Teaching styles: a Typologycal approach. In G. Channan & S. Delamont (Eds.), Frontiers of Classroom Research. Windsor: NFER Publishing Company.
9. Cheffers, J. Mancini, V. V., & Martinek, T. (1980). Interaction analysis: An application to nonverbal activity (2nd. ed.). St. Paul: Association for Productive Teaching.
10. Cohen, J.A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
11. Cremmers, B.P.M., & Tillema, H.H. (1987-88). The classroom as a social/emotional environment. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 23 (2), 1-7.
12. Ellet, C.D., Loup, K.S., & Chauvin, S.W. (1990). The system for teaching and learning aAssessment and review (STAR): Annotated guide to teaching an Learning. Baton Rouge, Lousiana: Lousiana State University, College of Education, Teaching Intership and Stadewide Teacher Evaluation Programs.
13. Ellet, C.D., Loup, K.S., & Chauvin, S.W. (1991). Development, validity and reliability of a new generation of assessment of effective teaching and learning: Future directions for the study of learning environment. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26, (2), 25-39.
14. Engelhart, M.D. (1972). Methods of Educational Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
15. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
16. Everston, C.M. & Green, J.L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
17. Flanders, N. (1966). Interaction analysis in the classroom: A manual for observers. Michigan: School of Education. University of Michigan.
18. Flanders, N. (1967). Teacher influence in the classroom. In E. Amidon & J.B.Hough (Eds.), Interaction analysis theory, research and application, (pp. 103-116). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
19. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Goodman, L.A. (1972). A modified multiple regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables. American Sociological Review, 37, 28-46.
21. Gottman, J.M. (1980). On analyzing for sequential connection and assessing interobsever reliability for the sequential analysis of observational data. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 361-368.
22. Gottman, J.M., & Roy, A.K. (1989). Sequential analysis. A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Haberman, S.J. (1978). Analysis of cualitative data. Vol. 1, Introductory topics. New York: Academic Press.
24. Jones, R R., Reid, J.B., & Patterson, G.R. (1975). Naturalistic observations in clinical assessment. In P. Mc Reynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 42-95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Knoke, D., & Burke, P.J. (1980). Log-linear models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Postic, M. (1977). Observation et formation des enseignants. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
27. Postic, M., & De Ketele, J.M. (1988). Observer les situations éducatives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
28. Sackett, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J.D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-649). New York: Wiley.
29. Sanson-Fisher, R.W., Poole, D., & Dunn, J. (1980). An empirical method for determining an appropriate interval length for recording behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 493-500.
30. SPSS Inc. (1990). SPSS for the Macintosh v. 4.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
31. Stubbs, M., & Delamont, S. (1976). Explorations in classroom observation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32. Tójar, J.C. (1993). Concordancia del registro observational en datas secuenciales. Investigation aplicada en el contexto del aula. Malaga: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Malaga.
33. Tójar, J.C. (In press). Concordancia en los registros de observation. Calidad de la investigación educativa en metodología observacional. Barcelona: PPU.
34. Woods, P. (1986). Inside Schools. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.