Self-rated health and coronary artery disease severity in patients with angina pectoris;Subiektywnie oceniony stan zdrowia, a nasilenie zmian w naczyniach wieńcowych u pacjentów z dusznica bolesna

Polski Przeglad Kardiologiczny

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 343-348

  Skrzypek, Michal ^a   Widomska Czekajska, Teresa ^a  

^a Katedry Nauk Human Lublinie ^*

Author keywords

Angina pectoris; Coronary artery disease; Functional status; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYMPTOM; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

EID: 17644436620     PISSN: 15075540     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Goldman L., Hashimoto B., Cook F. i wsp.: Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation, 1981, 6, 1227-1234.
2. 4 Revisions to classification of functional capacity and objective assessment of patients with disease of the heart. Circulation, 1994, 90, 644-645.
3. Tobiasz-Adamczyk B.: Jakość zycia w naukach społecznych i medycynie. Sztuka Leczenia, 1996, 2, 33-40.
4. Muldoon M. F., Barger S. D., Flory J. D. i wsp.: What are quality of life mearurements measuring? BMJ, 1998, 316, 542-545.
5. Denollet J.: Health complaints and outcome assessment in coronary heart disease. Psychosom. Med., 1994, 56, 463-474.
6. Hlatky M.A., Boineau R.E., Higginbotham M.B. i wsp.: A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). Am. J. Cardiol., 1989, 64, 651-654.
7. Alonso J., Permanyer-Miralda G., Cascant P. i wsp.: Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients. Reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index. Eur. Heart J., 1997, 18, 414-419.
8. Skrzypek M.: Analiza wsparcia spolecznego, strategii radzenia sobie ze stresem i innych wybranych czynników socjopsychologicznych oraz jakoścí zycia u pacjentów z dusznia̧, bolesna̧. Rozprawa doktorska. Maszynopis AM w Lublinie. Lublin 2000.
9. Blumenthal J.A., Burg M. M., Barefoot J. i wsp.: Social support type A behavior and coronary artery disease. Psychosom. Med., 1987, 49, 331-340.
10. Wilson I.B., Cleary P.D.: Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 1995, 1, 59-65.
11. Skrzypek M., Widomska-Czekajska T.: Biomedical and sociopsychological determinants of quality of life in patients with angina pectoris qualified for coronary angiography. International College of Psychosomatic Medicine, 16th World Congress on Psychosomatic Medicine, Göteborg, Sweden, 24-29 August 2001. Abstract 343, 93.
12. Wiklund I., Herlitz J., Johansson S. i wsp.: Subjective symptoms and well-being differ in women and men after myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J., 1993, 14, 1315-1319.
13. Czajkowski S.M.: Psychosocial aspects of women's recovery from heart disease. [w:] Women, stress and heart disease, red. K. Orth-Gomér, M. Chesney, N.K. Wenger. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah - New Jersey - London, 1998, 151-164.
14. Dłuzniewski M.: Zespół X. Klinika, 1997, 10, 495-497.
15. Shekelle R.B., Vernon S.W., Ostfeld A.M.: Personality and coronary heart disease. Psychosom. Med., 1991, 53, 176-184.