Six reasons why supply-oriented indicators systematically overestimate service quality in public transport

Transport Reviews

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 319-328

  Rietveld, Piet ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC TRANSPORT; RAILWAY TRANSPORT;

NEOPLEA;

EID: 17644414084     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144164042000335814     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Association of Train Operating Companies (2002) Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbook (London: ATOC).
2. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
3. Department for Transport (2002) Transport Ten Year Plan 2000: Delivering Better Transport-Progress Report (London: DoT).
4. Hickman, M. D. (2001) An analytic stochastic model for the transit vehicle holding problem, Transportation Science, 35, pp. 215-237.
5. McCarthy, P. (2001) Transportation Economics (Oxford: Blackwell).
6. Rietveld, P. and Roson, R. (2002) Direction dependent prices in public transport: a good idea? The back haul pricing problem for a monopolistic public transport firm, Transportation, 29, pp. 397-417.
7. Rietveld, P. and Verhoef, E. T. (1998) Social feasibility of policies to reduce externalities, in: K. J. Button and E. T. Verhoef (Eds) Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment, pp. 285-307 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
8. Small, K. (1992) Urban Transportation Economics (London: Harwood).
9. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in prospect theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, pp. 297-323.
10. Wagner, H. (1975) Principles of Operations Research (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).
11. Wardman, M., Nash, C., Shires, J., Johnson, D., Lythgoe, B. and Tyler, J. (2004) Appraising the benefits of regular train timetables. Paper presented at WC̀TR, Istanbul, Turkey, 2004.