Five-stage environmental exposure assessment strategy for mixtures: Gasoline as a case study

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 2711-2718

  Foster, Karen L ^a   Mackay, Don ^a   Parkerton, Thomas F ^b   Webster, Eva ^a   Milford, Lynne ^a  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION; DEGRADATION; GASOLINE; HYDROCARBONS; MIXTURES; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOILS;

EMISSION RATES; HUMAN RISK; MIXTURE COMPOSITION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

GASOLINE; HYDROCARBON; WATER;

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AIR; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DATA ANALYSIS; DEGRADATION; DOCUMENTATION; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HALF LIFE TIME; MODEL; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL;

AIR; ANIMALS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; GASES; GASOLINE; HALF-LIFE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER;

EID: 17644401050     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es048734p     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Environment Canada. Assessment Report-acetaldehyde; http://www.ec.gc.ca/ substances/ese/eng/psap/final/acetaldehyde.cfm, 2000.
2. European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Risk Assessment Reports: benzene, cumene, cyclohexane, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, n-pentane, toluene; http://ecb.jrc.it/esis/, 1999-2002.
3. Mackay, D.; Leinonen, P. J. Mathematical model of the behaviour of oil spills on water with natural and chemical dispersion; Report EPS-3-EC-7719; Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, 1977.
4. Yang, W. C.; Wang, H. Modelling of oil evaporation in aqueous environment. Water Res. 1979, 11, 879-887.
5. Mackay, D.; Paterson, S. The physical properties of fresh and weathered crude oils; Publication EE-13: A report to the Arctic marine oil spill program; Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, 1980.
6. Reijnhart, R.; Rose, R. Evaporation of crude oil at sea. Water Res. 1982, 16, 1319-1325.
7. Eastcott, L.; Shiu, W. Y.; Mackay, D. Modelling Petroleum in Soils. In Petroleum Contaminated Soils V. 1; Kostecki, P. T., Calabrese, E. J., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Chelsea, MI, 1989; pp 63-80.
8. Lee, C. L.; Eastcott, L.; Shiu, W. Y.; Mackay, D. Petroleum Contaminated Soil: Chemistry and Modeling. In Principles and Practices for Petroleum Contaminated Soils; Calabrese, E. J., Kostecki, P. T., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Chelsea, MI, 1993; pp 323-339.
9. EC (European Commission). Technical guidance documents in support of Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment of new notified substances and Regulation No. 1488/94 on risk assessment of existing substances; Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg, 1996.
10. Gustafson, J. B.; Griffith Tell, J.; Orem, D. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group Series Volume 3: Selection of representative TPH fractions based on fate and transport considerations; http://www.aehs.com/ publications/catalog/contents/Volumes.pdf, 1997.
11. Meijer, S. N.; Ockenden, W. A.; Steinnes, E.; Corrigan, B. P.; Jones, K. C. Spatial and temporal trends of POPs in Norwegian and UK background air: implications for global cycling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 454-461.
12. Meijer, S. N.; Ockenden, W. A.; Sweetman, A.; Breivik, K.; Gimalt, J. O.; Jones, K. C. Global distribution and budget of PCBs and HCB in background surface soils: implications for sources and environmental processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 667-672.
13. Ockenden, W. A.; Breivik, K.; Meijer, S. N.; Steinnes, E.; Sweetman, A. J.; Jones, K. C. The global re-cycling of persistent organic pollutants is strongly retarded by soils. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 121, 75-80.
14. Meijer, S. N.; Steinnes, E.; Ockenden, W. A.; Jones, K. C. Influence of environmental variables on the spatial distribution of PCBs in Norwegian and UK soils: implications for global cycling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2146-2153.
15. CONCAWE. A Survey of European Gasoline Exposures for the Period 1999-2001; Report 9/02; Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
16. Mackay, D. Multimedia Environmental Models: A Fugacity Approach, 2nd ed.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
17. Peterson, D. R. Calculating the aquatic toxicity of hydrocarbon mixtures. Chemosphere 1994, 29, 2493-2506.
18. U.S. EPA. Integrated risk information system (IRIS); http://www.epa.gov/ iris/; Washington, DC, 2004.
19. Peterson, D.; Parkerton, T. F. 2002, personal communication.
20. Mackay, D.; Shiu, W. Y.; Ma, K. C. Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate and Degradation Handbook (CD-ROM); CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
21. Verbruggen, E. M. J.; Hermens, J. L. M.; Tolls, J. Physicochemical properties of higher nonaromatic hydrocarbons: a literature study. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2000, 29, 1435-1446.
22. Ferris, S. W. Handbook of Hydrocarbons; Academic Press Inc.: New York, 1955.
23. Reid, R. C.; Prausnitz, J. M.; Sherwood, T. K. The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill Book Co.: New York, 1977.
24. Stephenson, R. M.; Malanowski, S. Handbook of the Thermodynamics of Organic Compounds; Elsevier: New York, 1987.
25. Bokis, C.; Heidman, J. L. 2003, ExxonMobil personal communication.
26. Gouin, T.; Mackay, D.; Webster, E.; Wania, F. Screening chemicals for persistence in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 881-884.
27. van de Meent, D. SimpleBox: a generic multi-media fate evaluation model; Report 6727200001; National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 1993.
28. EC (European Commission). EUSES, the European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances; National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), The Netherlands; Available from the European Chemicals Bureau (EC/JRC), Ispra, Italy, 1996.
29. MacLeod, M.; McKone, T. E.; Foster, K. L.; Maddalena, R. L.; Parkerton, T. F.; Mackay, D. Applications of contaminant fate and bioaccumulation models in assessing ecological risks of chemicals: a case study for gasoline hydrocarbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6225-6233.
30. McGrath, J. A.; Parkerton, T. F.; Di Toro, D. M. Application of the narcosis target lipid model to algal toxicity and deriving predicted no effect concentrations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2503-2517.
31. Dennison, J. E.; Andersen, M. E.; Clewell, H. J.; Yang, R. S. H. Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for volatile fractions of gasoline using chemical lumping analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 5674-5681.