Child protection and the conception of parental responsibility

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 220-229

  Mass, Mili ^a,c   Van Nijnatten, Carolus ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD HEALTH; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CHILD PROTECTION; CHILD WELFARE; HUMAN; ISRAEL; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; NETHERLANDS; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PARENTHOOD; PROTECTION; RESPONSIBILITY;

ADOPTION; ADULT; AWARENESS; CHILD; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PARENTS; PUBLIC POLICY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 17644397377     PISSN: 00029432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0002-9432.75.2.220     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barkai, M., & Mass, M. (1998). Mashmaut hamusagim "mesugalut horit ve" tovat hayeled" bepiskei din shel beit hamishpat haelion hadanim beimuz ktinim [The meanings of "parental capability" and "the best interests of the child" in Israeli Supreme Court decisions regarding the adoption of minors]. Jerusalem, Israel: Faculty of Law, Hebrew University.
2. Bennet, W. L., & Feldman, M. S. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
4. Clark, A. M., & Clark, A. D. B. (1976). Early experience: Myth and evidence. New York: Free Press.
5. Cooper, A., Hetherington, R., Baitow, K., Pitts, J., & Spriggs, A. (1995). Positive child protection. Dorset, England: Russell House Publishing.
6. Donzelot, J. (1979). The policing of families. New York: Pantheon.
7. Dutch Civil Code. (1995). Book 1 Section Articles 254-265 BW.
8. Eekelaar, J. (1993). Are parents morally obliged to care for their children? In J. Eekelaar & P. Sarćevic (Eds.) Parenthood in modern society (pp. 51-64). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
9. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment. New York: Penguin.
10. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. J. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. London: Macmillan.
11. Harré, R. (1981). The positivist-empiricist approach and its alternative. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry (pp. 3-18). New York: Wiley.
12. Hess, P. (1988). Case and context: Determinants of planned visit frequency in foster family care. Child Welfare, 67, 311-325.
13. Jonkers, J., & van Nijnatten, C. (1997). Ondertoezichtstelling of ontheffing? [Family supervision or abrogation]. Tijdschrift voor Familie en Jeugdrecht, 19, 48-74.
14. Katkin, D., Bullingham, B., & Levine, M. (1978). Above and beyond the best interests of the child: An inquiry into the relationship between social sciences and social action. Law and Society Review, 2, 665-687.
15. The Law of the Adoption of Minors. (1981). The book of laws: Book 1028 (p. 293).
16. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity, an essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 1961)
17. Mass, M. (1994). The need for a paradigm shift in social work: The study of parenting. Social Work and Social Science Review, 5, 130-145.
18. Mass, M. (1996). The narrative of parents. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 26, 423-442.
19. Mass, M. (1999). Legal parenthood and the continued parent-child relationship - the moral and experiential aspects of parenting. Adoption Quarterly, 2, 39-69.
20. Ophir, A. (2000). Lashon lara: Prakim beontologia shel hamousar [Speaking evil: Toward ontology of morals]. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Am Oved.
21. Parmigiani, S., & vom Saal, F. S. (Eds.). (1994). Infanticide and parental care. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic.
22. Parton, N. (1979). The natural history of child abuse: A study in social problem definition. British Journal of Social Work, 9, 431-452.
23. Roskies, E. (1972). Abnormality and normality. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
24. Rutter, M. (1984). Continuities and discontinuities in socioemotional development. In R. N. Emde & R. J. Harmon (Eds.), Continuities and discontinuities in development (pp. 41-63). New York: Plenum.
25. Sameroff, A. J., & Chandler, M. J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F. D. Horowitz, M. Hetheringtori, S. Scarr-Salapatek, & G. Siegel (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 187-244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Scheppele, K. L. (1989). Telling stories (foreword). Michigan Law Review, 87, 2073-2098.
27. Shamgar-Handelman, L. (1994). To whom does childhood belong? In J. Quotrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Winterberger (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 249-265). Aldershot, England: Avebury.
28. Shifman, P. (1989). Family law in Israel: Vol. 2. Jerusalem, Israel: Faculty of Law, Hebrew University.
29. Solnit, A. (1984). Theoretical and practical aspects of risks and vulnerability in infancy. Child Abuse and Neglect, 8, 133-145.
30. Stern, D. (1977). The first relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
32. van Nijnatten, C., Boesveldt, N., Schilperoord, A., & Mass, M. (2001). The construction of parental authority and co-operation in reports to the Dutch court. International Journal of Sociology of Law, 29, 237-252.